doctor patient

Wellness Wednesday: Following up on Serious Injury: the Role of Physical Therapy

When you are injured badly, you are in pain and you are shaken up, sometimes literally. You lose perspective. You may have temporary alteration of your memory mood and judgment. You need guidance on how to recover, and your instincts aren’t a good guide. That is why in good medical care environments, you have a team of people, from family and friends, to doctors and nurses who help you get better.

In the very best of medical care environments, you have those, plus the group of therapists: physical therapists, cognitive therapists, occupational therapists, and family therapists. These are the people who take you from healing and back into high functioning. We underutilize them. I write today to make you aware of all this by sharing what our experience has been thus far with my son Vale and his physical therapy.

As those of you who have been reading this blog know, our son Vale had a serious ski injury on Saturday February 6th. He sustained a comminuted (broken to pieces) fractured femur, a mild concussion, a broken rib and a mild pulmonary contusion. That evening he had a long emergency surgery requiring a great deal of internal fixation. The next day he was discharged home as per is customary. He required pain meds, and still had memory deficits, though he was basically himself. Appetite was slow to come and he was quite discouraged. 

Much to our surprise, they requested his first physical therapy visit the very next day, or post operative day two, Monday the 8th. I couldn’t imagine what they would be doing with him at that early stage, despite my familiarity with surgical recovery in general.

When we arrived, they informed us they had spoken with his surgeon and were appraised of his hospital course. They proceeded to perform consultation much like we doctors do, beginning with a history and then proceeding with a physical exam. However, this exam was precise, detailed and recorded, covering all neurological aspects, range of motion, and strength. 

I expected all this. What I didn’t expect was the best part. The facility was beautiful and open, and all the staff were fit and upbeat. There was even a freshly shampooed dog randomly going from area to area to cheer people up. The whole encounter brightened our son’s spirits, and renewed his hope. They told him all about the typical post op course with injuries like this. This showed him a light at the end of the tunnel. It gave him some tasks to do and milestones for progress, thereby dispelling feelings of powerlessness.

There were so many more things to do to help his recovery than we had anticipated. I often recommend that patients enter physical therapy. Not uncommonly they ask me, “ What could they possibly do that would help ? “ The answer is, go and see. Since Vale has entered PT, he has gotten serial cognitive testing, passive range of motion exercises, strength exercises, electrical stimulation and deep oil massage of the muscles near the fracture. Soon, when the incision is better healed, he will have water therapy. 

His sessions are not necessarily comfortable. Nonetheless he looks forward to them. He can see his own progress because it is actually measured. Thus he is consistently encouraged. They tell me this is typical. Today is post op day ten and it was his first day back to his University classes. He felt himself, and did not notice any problems in following the material or using his crutches. I credit his ongoing PT for his speedy recovery.

I encourage all of you to look into physical therapy if you have chronic pain, injury, or problems getting around. There are many other conditions which can benefit from physical therapy. Discuss this with your doctor at your next appointment to see if you might stand to benefit. 

Medical Monday: Breaking News from the World of Obstetrics and Gynecology 

Zika virus again begins the headlines. It has now been well established that Zika virus can be sexually transmitted. The CDC ( Centers for Disease Control) has recommended that men returning from Zika affected countries take special precautions if their partners are pregnant or apt to become pregnant. They are advised to abstain or use protection through the duration of the entire pregnancy. The primary method of transmission is still believed to be through mosquitos, however, Zika has recently been isolated from both saliva and urine. 

Zika’s devastating effects on the unborn are similar to effects caused by the more well known viruses Rubella and Cytomegalovirus (CMV). Zika virus is associated with microcephaly (small underdeveloped brain and skull, with attendant developmental disabilities) and eye defects, and so are CMV and Rubella.  Researchers are turning attention back to these better understood viruses to get clues about how the ZIka virus functions. 

Additional recommendations from the CDC and ACOG ( American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) include testing all women living in or returning from ZIka infected countries. The US Olympic Committee has reiterated the CDC cautions, but has not issued any prohibitions against anyone going to or participating in the games. 

In the interesting and promising department, Columbia has recorded over 3000 cases of Zika infected pregnant women. To date, no cases of microcephaly have been reported there. The reasons for this are uncertain. Post Zika Guillaine Barre syndrome has been studied in Columbia as well. Guillaine Barre is a reaction to certain viral infections which produces a usually temporary paralysis. It can be life threatening since it can paralyze the respiratory muscles. Columbian officials have noticed a 66 % increase in Guillaine Barre reactions compared to baseline. 

President Obama has asked Congress for 1.8 billion dollars in funding to combat the Zika Virus. As of Friday, there are 79 cases of Zika in the United States. 

Influenza is another viral danger which continues to deserve our attention. The good news there is that we have an effective vaccine. Flu vaccine is very important to pregnant women, since pregnant women are much more vulnerable to serious disease if they contract the flu. New research indicates flu vaccine in pregnancy is most effective if given in the first trimester. 

There are other situations which can cause serious birth defects. One is exceedingly common: alcohol. Last week the CDC made news by recommending that pregnant women abstain from all alcohol. They also advised health professionals to advise women to stop using it even if they are just trying to become pregnant or, more interestingly, are simply having unprotected sex. 

Frankly, these do not see like radical recommendations to me.  They certainly do not seem mysogynist or anti-women. However, that is how some women are reacting. The blogosphere has been ablaze with what is, in my opinion, inflammatory rhetoric, saying that the government is trying to "take over women’s bodies", and other such nonsense. I wonder what these commentators think of the draconian measures recommended by South American governments to keep pregnant women from getting Zika ? Authorities have advocated that women not get pregnant for two years, and if they already are, to cover themselves and stay inside. 

Here is an issue that may have a feminist component. Consider that only women must buy feminine hygiene products. They buy them in profusion, regularly, and all throughout their reproductive life. Some people believe that women should not have to pay sales tax on such products. President Obama is in favor of ending the so called “ tampon tax”. 

Viruses and alcohol can cause serious birth defects. While smoking does not, it is strongly associated with growth restriction, low fluid, abruption, and preterm birth. CDC data indicate 8.4 percent of pregnant women smoke. 

There us no doubt that our collective concern over the exotic and seemingly uncontrollable threat of Zika virus is justified. However this threat to pregnant women and others should be blended with renewed and commensurate concern for equally serious threats which we can address: smoking and alcohol. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wellness Wednesday: Recovering from a Serious Injury

image.jpg

This last weekend my son Vale had a major skiing accident. He broke his femur, had a pulmonary contusion, a broken rib, and a mild concussion.  He had to have emergency surgery. We quickly travelled to attend him, and since then we have been making arrangements for his recovery care. 

Though he will be off school for a time he will stay at college and we will return home. Therefore, I have been working with a team of friends and relatives to accomplish his care. This will, of course, consist of a series of wound checks, physical therapy appointments and post op appointments. It will also consist of a calendar of people doing shopping, making meals and doing laundry. When he returns to school in two or three weeks, it will mean getting driven to campus and wheelchairing around. It will mean seeing how it goes.

It has also meant getting correspondence passed back and forth between the doctors, physical therapists and the university faculty. To coordinate all this, I have had to send no end of contact information. I have had to create shared calendars and documents in the cloud, and distribute them to all his friends and family who have stepped forward to help.

Vale has had to deal with pain, disappointment and disruption. It is taking all of us together to shore him up during this trying time. It is taking everything from favorite foods to ice packs, but it is worth it. Even though it has been only four days, we can see distinct and major improvements every day.

 I am in awe of his caregivers. The surgeon and anesthesiologist spent significant time on the phone with me both before and after the case. It was easy to tell they were top notch, but they were also genuinely invested in my son, and empathized with me having to be so far away during the surgery.  I will be forever grateful for the time and energy they spent. I later leaned that that they spent this kind of energy during the entire weekend, since Vale's hip fracture was one of five such cases. The winds in the mountains had been high, and had swept the ski slopes to a hard shiny gloss. It took its toll.

Vale's physical therapist was a ray of hope. She came from both academic and clinical practice backgrounds, and was deeply invested in her field. She was immediately able to put us at ease and to identify all kinds of helpful strategies. Vale felt 100 percent better after one appointment, from a combination of the physical treatments, but also the encouragement of knowing his prognosis.

All this touched me as a mother and as a physician. It sheds renewed light on what I do.

Wellness Wednesday: The Medicine Cabinet 

A well stocked medicine cabinet will help your family feel their best. It will also help them get better more quickly from everyday ailments like colds and minor injuries. Here are some dos and dont’s you will want to know when playing doctor. 

First the dont’s. 

  • Don’t keep any out of date medications, prescription or otherwise. 
  • Don’t disregard handling instructions. Some prescription medications require refrigeration. 
  • Don’t store medications of any kind in unlabelled bottles. Throw out anything whose identity is the least bit uncertain. 
  • Don’t fail to take your whole prescribed course of medication. You will not get better as quickly. Even worse, in the you may foster the development of antibiotic resistant bacteria. Think about it. If you only take the first 4 days of a seven day course of antibiotics, you will kill all the easily killed bacteria, and leave the more resilient ones to repopulate your body. If you take all your medications correctly, you should not have any “ left over” in the first place. 
  • If you had surgery or an injury, and you were prescribed narcotic pain pills, use them only when you need to. If you are better and no longer need them, dispose of them. Don’t keep them just in case. 

How do you dispose of old medications ? It turns out this is not as easy as it sounds. 

Check out this comprehensive guide from the Food and Drug Administration. 

http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm101653.htm

 

Now the Do’s 

 

Do have simple non-narcotic pain relievers handy and in their original bottles.

  • Acetaminophen, aka tylenol for aches, pain and fever. Can be taken on an empty stomach and during pregnancy. 
  • Ibuprofen, aka motrin or advil also for aches pain and fever, but with an anti-inflammatory component as well. Should not be taken on an empty stomach or during pregnancy. 

 

Do have upper respiratory remedies. 

  • Nasal decongestant for daytime (These are non sedating.) 
  • Nasal decongestant for nighttime. (These can be the sedating ones)
  • Cough suppressant i.e. dextromethorphan 
  • Zinc containing cough lozenges which are low on sugar. 
  • Lots of herb teas and broth mixes for hydration. 
  • Lots of kleenex, and a reliable thermometer. 
  • A peroxide containing mouthwash for use after brushing and flossing, but just before bed. (Key to prevent and kick those sore throats ! ) 

All of these measures will actually help you get better more quickly as well as provide comfort. Most upper respiratory infections are viral and self limited and do not require antibiotics. However,  but if one is bad or persistent, call your doctor. There is no reason to hesitate. 

 

For allergic reactions: 

  • Benedryl capsule in case of a minor allergic reaction like rash. They are sedating. 
  • EPI pens if anyone has a serious allergy or asthma or lives in a place where there are bees or other stinging species (OK everyone should have an EPI- pen in their house.).  Consult with your doctor about this since they will need to order it. 

 

Stomach rememedies are trickier.

  • Tums or Rolaids are not the best for heartburn, since they are calcium carbonate. These give short term relief of stomach acid, but then go on within the hour to stimulate the production of more gastric acid. Try prilosec OTC. Speak to your doctor if stomach acid symptoms are more than a rare event. 
  • For loose stools, do not automatically turn to Lomotil. You can make yourself sicker this way. The cause of lose stools must be determined before a motility lowering agent can be given.
  • DO push liquids by mouth and by soaking a tub of water to stay hydrated until you can get care and get better. Liquids which contain a little something ( electrolytes, sodium, sugar) are best. Think broth or soda water with fruit juice. Elelctrolyte replacement drinks are ideal. 

 

For skin, eyes, hair and teeth : 

(All these should be junk free, and by that I mean free of artificial fragrance, coloring, etc)

  • Gentle cleanser 
  • Gentle exfoliating scrub 
  • Moisturizer for face and some for body; For body I prefer a mix of cocoa butter and coconut oil. 
  • Alpha hydroxy acids are evidence based treatments for the younger set.
  • Retinoids and vitamin C serums are evidence based treatments for the over 40 crowd.
  • Strong water resistant sunscreen in plentiful quantity, as well as sunscreen lip balm. 
  • 1% hydrocortisone cream for minor rashes where skin is intact. This will suppress itching but impair healing, so use it sparingly and wash your hands afterwards. 
  • Eye moisturizer in little sterile vials for dry eyes or to help with removal of a foreign body, 
  • Bandaids, tape, gauze, antibiotic ointment for cuts and scrapes. You do not need alcohol for wounds, or even peroxide. Minor wounds are best cleaned with warm soap and water. Anything more extensive goes to the doctor. 

 

Did you know oral health is key to avoiding other illnesses ? Do stock the following: 

  • Toothpaste with fluoride and some grit 
  • Wide waxed dental floss for use every night, maybe even when you are in the shower. 
  • Peroxide containing mouthwash

For Hair: 

  • Shampoo, used gently and only at the scalp if your hair really needs it ( Dry hair does not ! ) 
  • Conditioner, every time, for all hair types. 

 

This should be a good start to your well stocked medicine cabinet. 

Next week we will have a little more fun and talk more in depth about hair health. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Medical Monday: Breaking News from the World of Obstetrics and Gynecology 

Good Monday. We start out with good news, noting findings reported at the World Diabetic Congress that those who breastfeed have a substantially lower risk of developing type two diabetes later in life. 

Northern hemisphere readers will note that the CDC ( Centers for Disease Control) has reported that this year's flu activity, so far, is relatively low. They also note that slow starts aren't unusual and those that haven’t yet gotten a flu shot should get one, especially since this year’s vaccine is good match. 

USPTF (The United States Preventive Services Task Force) has once again released it’s version of guidelines for breast cancer screening. They are, predictably, lax, and recommend individualization for women of average risk before age of 50, and every other year between 50 and 74. They have chosen this age range of screening since they state their data show this is the age range “ of greatest benefit” from mammograms. This is no doubt true since this is when most cancers are diagnosed. However, what they cannot seem to understand is that women want ALL the benefit that mammograms can confer. Think about it. Their recommendations would condemn any woman below 50 of average risk to having her cancer detected only when it became palpable. Of course mammograms detect them far earlier, when they are more curable. 

Women want ALL the benefits mammograms can confer, and yes, they understand all such diagnostic tests must be weighed against their risks. But in this case, the risks are so small. They are the risks of biopsies for concerning findings which come back negative for cancer. They are also, according to the USPTF, the risks of fear and discomfort of the procedure. I have seen two and a half decades of patients and I have never heard one patient cite these risks as even coming close to outweighing the benefit of screening for cancer. Where does the USPTF get the idea that these particular risks are so important or that women even care that much about them ?

The good news is that the controversy has hit the airwaves and the blogosphere. NBC, the Washington Post, the NY Times, and Newsweek, among others, all covered it. ACOG (The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) maintains a recommendation of annual mammograms after 40, and the American Cancer Society recommends annual mammograms from 45 on. ACOG plans to convene a conference to sort out the issue once and for all. 

Group B strep is an important pathogen for moms and newborns. A new vaccine against it is under development. 

Big news: Ovarian cancer actually seems to arise in the tubes. The data for this is sufficiently compelling that ACOG is recommending removal of the tubes with preservation of the ovaries when applicable. 

The CDC reports that the average age of first time mom’s is at an all time high, being 26 years and 4 months. This can be attributed, at least in part, to fewer teen pregnancies. 

In sobering news, a new virus called Zika is causing birth defects in the Caribbean and South America. It is spread through mosquitos. The CDC may warn pregnant women not to travel in that region. I’m sure we’ll hear more about efforts to deal with this in the near future. 

The effort to develop personalized vaccines to treat ovarian cancer is in the early stages. This work is on the desk of the FDA as we speak. 

Wow, so much happening ! Stay tuned for more breaking news from the world of Obstetrics and Gynecology next week on medical Monday. 

Medical Monday: Breaking News from the World of Obstetrics and Gynecology 

Good Monday and Happy New Year. ACOG (The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) has once again reiterated the newer recommendations regarding cervical cancer screening. They have stated that “ Women ages 30 to 65 at "average risk" for cervical cancer should receive co-testing with cytology and HPV testing every five years or screening with cytology every three years”. ( Cytology just means sending cells with a pap and co-testing means DNA testing for HPV, Human Papilloma Virus via the same sample.) I would like to emphasize a couple of aspects of this statement: the phrase “ average risk”, and the idea that they are talking about sending specimens to the lab. 

Average risk is not precisely defined, and this is ok, since it gives clinicians room for applying clinical judgement to individual patient cases. Average risk does not certainly include those patients, who are by virtue of disease or medication, immunocompromised. It does not include those who have recently had precancerous cells in the cervix, vagina or vulva. In my opinion it does not include those who have a significant smoking habit, since smoking is tightly associated with accelerating the progress of HPV disease. I do not believe average risk includes those with alcohol or drug problems since these patients can have poor immune function and struggle with satisfying recommended follow up protocols. In my opinion, average risk also should not include those with high risk sexual habits, such as having unprotected sex or large numbers of partners. But does the media ever highlight any of these things ? I have not seen it. 

These ACOG recommendations are about the recommended sampling frequency for cells on the cervix. They are not a statement about the frequency of annual exams or even pelvic exams. Those proceed on their own schedules for their own separate indications. The media has not done a good job at highlighting this important distinction. After all, a woman is more than just her cervix. 

The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) has received a request from a group of researchers to retract their own study from the Journal on the grounds that they have discovered that the lead researcher has falsified data about the usefulness of nitroglycerin for improving bone density.  Kudos to those whistleblower researchers. 

South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) will revise its regulations concerning the practices of licensed midwives, what we call lay midwives, meaning those who are not Certified Nurse Midwives. The DHEC was picketed by about 50 midwives. ACOG has said that while women deserve the right to chose where they deliver, they should be informed of the risks and benefits of the choices, including the two to threefold risk of neonatal death while delivering outside the hospital. (This data came from a study reported in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) and involved a study of 80,000 pregnancies in Oregon.)

Let’s think a little more about that statistic on neonatal death. Neonatal death is defined as the baby dying in labor or in the first month after birth. Why would such a terrible thing happen in the hospital ? High risk pregnant patients come to the hospital. High risk mothers may have very early labor, ruptured membranes, or severe preeclampsia, all resulting in deliveries so early that babies are far more apt to die or have serious morbidities. This is the source of neonatal death in the hospital, not the average pregnant women who comes in for labor or induction.  On the other hand, most licensed lay midwives restrict their practice to low risk patients, with none of these aforementioned problems. And yet many more of their patients end up with dead babies, despite the fact that hospital caregivers are dealing with these sometimes insurmountable obstacles. Problems which are solved by a simple medication in the IV, or the use of forceps, or even a C Section in the hospital, result in death when the same problems occur outside the hospital.

Speaking of neonatal death being two to three times more prevalent among those who birth at home, did you ever consider that this is a group average ? What happens when you unpack that group ? It turns out that first timers delivering at home have a 14 fold increase risk of first apgar score of ZERO, which is tantamount to neonatal death. And while the multiparous patients (women with multiple prior births) may do better with labor, they are much more prone to hemorrhages and other maternal complications, which are not even addressed in this statistic. 

So beware of the medical reporting in the popular media. Don’t take those statistics at face value. Remember the actual human realities behind them. 

Stay tuned for more breaking news from the world of Obstetrics and Gynecology next week on Medical Monday. 

Medical Monday: Breaking News from the World of Obstetrics and Gynecology 

Medical Headlines took a bit of holiday break just like us, so today’s report will be brief. 

The Journal of Pediatrics recently presented research that has shown that many new parents use car seats incorrectly. The most common mistakes are straps too lose and chest clips placed too low. Anyone with doubts can just stop by any labor and delivery or pediatric clinic for an on the spot demonstration of the correct technique. 

In the good idea department, the American Journal of Public Health reports that young pregnant women  might get significant benefits with group prenatal care. The study groups ranged in age between 14-21 and received either traditional prenatal care or group prenatal care. Those receiving care in the group setting were 33 % less likely to have a small for gestational age baby. Personally I think it would be fun to instruct young women in a group setting. 

In the frustrating and dangerous section, Reuters has reported on Canadian study retrospectively comparing 11,000 low risk women who had home birth with 11,000 low risk women with hospital birth. Their endpoints were still birth or death. For these endpoints, there was no significant difference in outcomes, with the incidence at home being 1.5/1000 versus 0.94/1000 in the hospital. There are two glaring problems with drawing a conclusion from this: 

1. The incidence of stillbirth and neonatal death is small in both cases, so comparisons of even large numbers cases are relatively unrevealing.

2. We care about many more outcomes than still birth or neonatal death. For example, we care about near death of the baby or the mother, brain damage, post partum hemorrhage, retained placenta, postpartum infection, and so many more grave life altering things. The truth of the matter is that neonatal and perinatal medicine is so good now that no matter how badly a case is managed, modern medicine can almost always salvage it enough so that it does not qualify as a stillbirth or a neonatal death. Badly managed cases requiring intensive perinatal and or neonatal care that do not result in stillbirth or death are definitely things I should think everyone would want to avoid, but nonetheless are NOT on the radar of this study. For that matter badly managed cases that require intensive perinatal and or neonatal care that do not result in stillbirth or death but that DO result in bad outcomes like brain damage are not also reflected in this study’s conclusions. How helpful is that ? And yet, what is the Reuter’s headline ? “ Home Births May Be Safe For Low Risk Pregnancies “ Really ?

From the “ clues on the trail” department, we have the following two tantalizing tidbits. One, it turns out that there is some sort of association between gum disease and breast cancer. Those with gum disease have a 14% increased risk of the disease. Add smoking and it jumps to 20-30 % and that means smoking ANYTIME in the last 20 years. Yikes ! information like this could ultimately help us understand how breast cancer arises or persists. 

Two, Metformin, a common medication to help with ovulatory dysfunction, polycystic ovary syndrome, carbohydrate intolerance, and diabetes, “can block the release of toxins from the placenta when preeclampsia is present." Wow cool. Now someone smart needs to figure out why.

Ending with heartwarming news, the journal Pediatrics has presented research showing that “ kangaroo care” benefits premature and underweight babies in several measurable ways. Kangaroo care is prolonged skin to skin contact, and it is associated with half the risk of serious infection, 78% lower risk of low core temperature, and 88% lower risk of dangerously low blood sugar. 

 

So go hug your kid and have a happy new year. 

Wellness Wednesday: Holiday Wellness Collection 

Here is a little collection of holiday wellness quick reads from my past blog posts. I hope they help the next week or two be merry and bright. 

Holidays, the Happy Disruption

Holiday Wellness

Gratitude is at the Center of Wellness

Look forward to more post collections during the holiday week while I take a little time off from writing and just highlight the “ need to know “ stuff. 

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. 

May the light of the season be within you. 

 

Medical Monday: Breaking News from the World of Obstetrics and Gynecology 

This weeks news is all about the facts and figures. Statistics is like pie. It is all about how you cut it. That is to say, the real meaning of raw data is challenging to correctly interpret. A great deal of the message from a study depends on how the data is presented. Be wary about drawing conclusions from studies where none can be drawn. 

The CDC report indicates that the number of abortions in the United States has hit a record low compared to 1990. This is true for all ethnic groups.

A new study has hit the press indicating that use of SSRIs, common antidepressants, in the first trimester is NOT associated with increased risk of autism spectrum disorders. Nonetheless the study also showed babies whose mother’s took SSRIs were 75% more likely to get autism than than their peers. Whether this is related to the mom’s condition, the medication or something else is totally unknown and cannot be known from this study. 

In the strange, counterintuitive and questionable department, a new observational study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association shows more complications among those with a planned C section compared to those with an emergency C section done after labor. This is against what has been show before, and against common sense. Authors at the NYT Blog Well speculate that somehow the labor is “ good” for babies. You just as well might speculate that people who chose elective C sections are less healthy to begin with. No conclusions can be drawn, although many will be. 

New findings in the Journal Cancer Epidemiology show that while cancer rates are declining in developed countries, they are increasing in the developing parts of the world. With development comes smoking, and more obesity, which increase the risk for certain cancers. 

The now ancient Women’s Health Initiative, which gathered data on a great many things, has been mined once again. This time it has revealed an association between smoking and infertility. No surprises there. 

I guess I am not the only one who doubts the work of the USPTSF on the issue of breast cancer screening and mammograms. Over 60 lawmakers, headed by Representative Debbie Schultz of Florida, have included a provision in the new budget requiring that the US government officially recommends breast cancer screenings at age 40 rather than 50 as the UPTSF does. Looks like they feel American women are willing to undergo some increased anxiety and discomfort in exchange for earlier detection, longer life, and less mortality. 

A new study out of Britain once again raises the question as to whether the use of the Ca 125 blood test can help detect ovary cancer and save lives. The results are by no means conclusive, but they will provide an impetus for much needed additional study. 

Back to pie. This week I hope you have several kinds, pumpkin, cherry and whatever is your favorite. Merry Christmas week ! 

 

 

Medical Monday: Breaking News from the World of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Until recently, the only treatment for preeclampsia is delivery. However, a new study is underway to test Recombinant Human Antithrombin to manage early onset ( 23-30 weeks) preeclampsia. As the same suggests, this medication acts by inhibiting abnormal blood clotting and inflammation, two components of preeclampsia. If this helps, this will be the first medication to directly address this common and serious disease. 

In the unbelievable department, The Government Accountability Department (GAO) has discovered something concerning at the National Institute of Health (NIH) . They have discovered that the NIH does not, in their research, always keep data on sex, thereby making it impossible to determine whether or not an intervention or exposure affects men and women differently. Those of us from the world of Ob/Gyn can tell you that rather often, the same factor will affect men quite differently than it will affect women. 

Here’s your reference http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-16-13

The Radiologic Society of North America heard research results indicating that the recent Medicaid Expansion has boosted rates of breast cancer screening in low income women. Assuming these and other women do not pay too much attention to the USPSTF ( US Preventive Services Task Force) recommendations of later and less frequent mammograms, we may soon see increased rates of early detection and eventually, longer survival. 

ACOG (The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) has made its strongest statement yet on pregnancy, stating not only that it is safe, but that it is recommended on a daily basis and should be the norm. 

OB/GYNS all over the world are nodding on this one. The Journal of the American Medical association has indicated the WHO's (World Health Organization) optimal rate of C section at 10% is too low. As C section rates rise to 15%, the study shows maternal and infant deaths decrease. In fact, maternal and infant deaths continue to decline through about 19%. This is the sweet spot, meaning where maternal and infant well being are at their highest. In the US about 33% of births happen by C section. This probably has to do with many things, including our culture, patient preference, doctor’s risk tolerance, the medico-legal climate, and the obesity epidemic. We can improve. 

Sobering : False positive mammograms may be linked to a higher risk of breast cancer later in life. The group in question is those whose mammograms indicate the need for a biopsy but then whose biopsies are negative. These women, despite negative biopsies, have a 39 % higher risk of breast cancer in their future that women who didn’t require a biopsy. I wonder how this finding will factor in to the recommended frequency of mammograms. So many authorities are weighing in on how frequently they should be done. ACOG still says every 1-2 years after 40. 

It turns out that giving flu vaccine to pregnant women in the second and third trimester benefits not only the mom but at least have of the unborn babies as well. Bonus ! 


Stay tuned next week for more breaking news from the world of Ob/Gyn ! 




Medical Monday: Breaking News from the World of Obstetrics and Gynecology 

California and Oregon will soon allow pharmacists to screen patients and prescribed birth control pills. While the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists considers this a step in right direction, they believe they should be available over-the-counter, plain and simple. While it is true that low dose combination birth control pills can have medical complications in a very small percent of people, by and large their health benefits far outweigh their risks.

As most of you probably are already aware, hepatitis C has a new medical treatment which provides a cure in a very high percentage of people. However, hepatitis B has remained a challenge, and in particular, we have had to deal with the problem of vertical passage of the virus from mother to baby during pregnancy, labor and delivery. However recently at the meetings of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, new research was presented. In the course of a randomized controlled trial, a drug called Tenofovir was shown to be able to reduce vertical transmission. 

Beautiful happy mother breastfeeding outdoor.jpg

Yet another encouraging recommendation about exercise in pregnancy has been released. According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, nearly half of US women gain too much weight while they're pregnant. We all know that women who gain too much weight in pregnancy are very uncomfortable. However they also have higher rates of miscarriage, premature birth, stillbirth, and babies with birth defects. They’re also more likely to have heart problems, sleep apnea, gestational or pregnancy associated diabetes, preeclampsia also known as toxemia, and abnormal blood clots. They are at higher risk for cesarean section. So there are ample reasons to find ways to control this weight gain. 

The new memo released by ACOG advises pregnant women to exercise regularly and more often than they currently do. The memo states that while walking is the best exercise, jogging, Pilates, yoga, cycling, swimming, and other forms of exercise are perfectly acceptable. ACOG cautions against contact sports such as skiing, and other specialized sports such as scuba diving.

More good news: it appears that breast-feeding for two months or more reduces a gestational diabetic’s risk of developing type II diabetes later in life by 50 %. Moreover, the risk of diabetes lessens as the patients breast-fed longer.

Finally, here is some good news that initially sounds a lot like bad news. Since 2010, there has been a significant increase in the number of women under age 26 who have received a diagnosis of early-stage cervical cancer. In the next age group, 26-34, the numbers were unchanged. What changed for the younger age group? The answer is the availability of insurance. One of the features of the ACA, The affordable care act, was to allow children to stay on their parents insurance plans through the age of 26. Most likely the increase in diagnoses came from increased compliance with recommended screening, i.e. pap smears. Once again, we are reminded that appropriate screening leads to early diagnosis, which leads to less invasive treatments, fewer complications, and higher rates of cure. 

Stay tuned for more breaking news from the world of OB/GYN next week on Medical Monday.



Medical Monday: Breaking News from the World of Obstetrics and Gynecology 

Happy Monday on this short week ! This week in honor of Thanksgiving I plan to apply the filter of gratitude to the news that I feature. Let’s see how this works out. 

The LA Times recently reported on the actual C Section rate in the US ( 33%)  as compared to the theoretical ideal of 15 %. An ACOG (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) spokesman indicated that this discrepancy was largely about risk tolerance of the involved parties. Gratefulness filter: Le’t be glad we live in a place where C sections are readily available to those who need them. 

Findings coming out of the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study indicate that black women with the healthiest diets were 34 % less likely to develop ovarian cancer that their counterparts who ate the most unhealthy diet. Gratefulness filter: Diet is an easy factor to modify !

Findings presented at the American College of Rheumatology indicate that Denosumab was superior to Zoledronic Acid ( Zometa) at restoring low bone density due to osteoporosis. Gratefulness filter: This is great news for all with low bone density ! 

The Supreme Court rejects the case against Planned Parenthood. Justices Scalia and Thomas dissent. Gratefulness filter: Let is be glad we live in a country that respects free speech of differing parties, that observes due process and the rule of law. 

About 10 % of all new mothers suffer from post partum depression. New York is rolling out a ambitious program which will require that all expectant and new mothers will be screened for depression. Gratefulness filter: Thank goodness awareness is increasing about this important and treatable problem. 

Rhode Island has a new state mandate requiring HPV vaccine for youngsters. Nearly three quarters of seventh graders received it by the start of the school year. Gratefulness filter: Thank goodness we have a way to prevent cervical cancer. 

Count your blessings this week and stay tuned for more news from the world of OB/Gyn next week on Medical Monday ! 







Medical Monday: Weekly News Update in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Good Monday !

I am returning from a great five days back at Stanford with our son Forest, who is now also an alumni. We attended “ Classes without Quizzes” and enjoyed ourselves immensely. We learned about numerous things, including a little about the way the brain functions during early language development, the latest in nutrition research, and a MMOG, yes, a massive multiplayer online game called EteRNA which has become a powerful tool in the design of tiny RNA machines which may be used to treat disease. We also took a yoga Piyo Hip Hop Fusion class, went on a pro multi-ethnic eating tour and saw tons of old friends. 

So now we return inspired, excited to move the needle forward in everything we do, including Medical Mondays ! 

Flibanserin went on sale this last Saturday. Flibanserin is of course the pill to treat low libido in women. It goes by the name Addyi. Does anyone know how to pronounced this ? Someone got paid to think of that name, you know. I can’t wait to see the commercials. For some real information about this drug, please see my prior post HERE

This week, in a 2000 word opinion piece in the New York Times, a political scientist Courtney Jung, criticized breast feeding activists for putting too much pressure on women to breastfeed. She states broad based research indicates the benefits of breastfeeding are  “ modest”. Could this op ed have anything to do with the fact that she is releasing a sensational new book called “Lactivism” next month ? Imagine running a 2000 word ad for your upcoming book in the New York Times. I wonder if they even paid her for her ad.

Her subtitle includes many of us: 

How Feminists and Fundamentalists, Hippies and Yuppies, and Physicians and Politicians Made Breastfeeding Big Business and Bad Policy

I am just going to go out here on a limb and disagree and say that I do not think breastfeeding is bad policy. I guess I’m kind of a rebel that way. 

The American Academy of Pediatricians has come out saying that "no amount of alcohol is safe for unborn babies". The new guideline “identifies prenatal exposure to alcohol as the leading preventable causes birth defects and intellectual disabilities in children.” It was previously thought that "a small amount" of alcohol is okay in pregnancy. According to the CDC (The Centers for Disease Control), about 10% of women self-report that they drink alcohol in pregnancy. So in my simplistic mind this means that if women comply with this recommendation, 10% of the entire next crop of babies could be significantly developmentally better off than the last group. Wouldn’t this have staggeringly good effects on the population ? 

The American Cancer Society has revised its recommendations for mammograms once again stating that they should start at age 45 in a patient of average risk, and go to every other year at the age of 55, provided that the woman is expected to live at least 10 more years. The purpose here is to "eliminate false positives and over treatment’.

Has anyone ever considered asking the question, How bad is the badness of a false positive? And what do they mean by overtreatment? Do they mean biopsies which turn out to be benign or do they mean lumpectomies or mastectomies? Most physicians do not consider a biopsy to be a treatment. Most patients consider a benign result a great relief. I have never heard of a patient saying ”Doctor, my biopsy was benign. It looks like I really didn't need that biopsy after all ”. If biopsies were taken out of the “over treatment “ calculations would there really be any unnecessary “treatments” left to lament ?

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has maintained their stance on mammograms every one to two years from the age of 40 forward. It also recommends a clinical breast exam annually. The American Cancer Society is dropping their recommendation for an annual clinical breast exam since it has not"been shown to save lives.” They say nothing about whether it extends lives. Is important for readers to know that there are many studies designed to determine whether or not a certain intervention prevents death in the course of the study. Preventing death is the same thing as saving life, no matter if you die at one year or ten years after treatment.  Studies geared to show an interventions ability to save life do not necessarily have the power to show it extends life. ACOG keeps its position on mammograms and clinical breast exams because earlier more frequent mammograms and clinical breast exams are associated with earlier diagnosis and longer life after breast cancer. 

I had better stop writing since there is steam coming out of my keyboard and my ears again. 

Stay tuned for more news from the wacky world of OB/GYN next week on Medical Monday. 

Medical Monday: Weekly News Update in Obstetrics and Gynecology 

Did you know that some insurance companies offer rebate incentives to get indicated mammograms ? A recent editorial in the Journal of the American Medical Association called this “ an ethically disconcerting distraction”. What do you think ? I think advanced breast cancer is far more expensive than early cancer caught and cured. 

A new study from the University of Minnesota School of Public Health has shown that less than half of new mothers returning to work have adequate space and time to pump. Meanwhile, in related news, the Army now requires commanders to allow breastfeeding soldiers to have time and space to pump. To clarify, many soldiers stay stateside or in non-hostile countries with family on bases and serve in technical or support positions. 

One article and two more separate recent studies indicate a higher infant mortality for non- hospital births than hospital births. ACOG estimates risk at two to threefold across the board. Remember there is also evidence demonstrating a 14 fold incidence of first Apgar of ZERO in those delivering their first baby at home. All this seems self evident to me given all my eyes have seen. 

The American College of Physicians has come out against routine pelvic exams in the the asymptomatic woman. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has made it clear it supports annual pelvic exams. Recall that pelvic exams need not always include a pap, since a pap is the collection of cells from the cervix to be evaluated in the lab. Pelvic exams confer a wealth of information about infection, pelvic relaxation, masses in the uterus, masses in the ovaries, etc. Ask any ob/gyn; They will tell you they find significant things on pelvic exams in asymptomatic women all the time. It looks like this needs to be formally studied. 

Uh oh, more bad news for Essure, those little coils placed in the tubes for sterilization. (Darn it, this seemed so promising. ) A new study in the British Medical Journal evaluated over 52,000 women sterilized with Essure. These women were 10 times more likely to go to surgery in the following year than those that were sterilized with a traditional tubal sterilization procedure. It is interesting to note that the FDA ( Food and Drug Administration) did NOT require documentation of Essure’s performance though a RCT ( randomized controlled trial). 

A study in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute has shown 61% of women obtaining mammograms will have at least one false positive report. They are advocating that physicians do more to educate and reduce anxiety associated with these results. 

In the good news and empowerment department, a Norwegian Study reports that pregnant women who exercise regularly in the three months prior to pregnancy report less pelvic pain in pregnancy that their non exercising counterparts. And this is making me smile: High impact exercise was the most strongly associated with decreased pain. So, did these women go through life feeling less pain to begin with thus tolerate exercise and pregnancy better, or did the performance of the exercise change something about the way they perceive pain ? A study like this cannot answer these questions, but they are interesting to ask. 

Stay tunes for more news form the world of OB/GYN next week on Medical Monday. 

Structure Sunday: The Structure of Prevention 

Here’s a simple question: Is it hard or easy to stay well ? 

Staying well is two things: avoiding disease and optimizing health. I’ll be the first to tell you that there are some diseases you simply can’t avoid. I’ll also be the first to tell you that most diseases are a preventable. 

What is prevention ? Is prevention hard or easy ? Prevention is not one thing. It is collection of different actions. Most importantly, these are done over time, on a meaningful schedule, and so we call them habits. I find that lots of people do certain few healthy things once in a while. Oftentimes these same people wonder why they do not see gains in health or fitness. What they are missing is the element of time. Taking one, two or ten habits and performing them in perpetuity over time is what makes the changes. If I could change just a few ideas in my patient’s minds, this would be one of them. 

Prevention requires you to harness the element of time. Time gives your actions power. Most prevention habits are simple easy acts in and of themselves. By themselves they don’t so much. Multiply them by months and they make significant and long lasting changes. 

Here are some super simple acts which you can multiply over time. 

Mind: 

Record three things for which you are grateful before you go to bed. 

Read them upon arising. 

In a conversation, listen first then respond with “I” statements. 

Think and take two full breaths before responding during a conflict. 

Meditate for 10 minutes per day. 

Have about 6 close friends. 

Consider having a partner. 

Have a pet of whom you take good care. 

Ensure your work is meaningful. 

Don’t overspend. 

Take your allotted vacations. 

 

Body: 

Wash your hands at work and when you get home. 

Get your required vaccinations. 

Sleep at least 7-8 hours a night. 

Wear seat belts. 

Use sunscreen.

Eat three meals and three snacks each with protein and produce. 

Avoid simple refined carbohydrates. 

Use olive oil and green tea. 

Ban soda, smokes and drugs. 

Limit to one wine or beer per day. 

Drink 3 liters water per day. 

Brush twice a day, floss and use a peroxide mouthwash before bed. 

Exercise for half hour 5-6 times per week combining cardio and light resistance. 

Incorporate yoga every week. 

 

Super basic, right ?

Super powerful.

That’s what these habits are when repeated over time. 

Prevention doesn’t hurt, it’s not expensive, and you can do it anywhere. It does take a plan to carve out the small slots in the day to do these things, but it really isn’t hard. Just keep the list handy, do the items, and you will wake up in a few months and notice some pleasant changes. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Food Friday: Fasting and What To Do Instead

Fasting and cleansing make headlines. They are dramatic trendy measures taken by those seeking improved health. But do they work ? Are they safe ? 

Fasting is generally regarded as going off food for at least a day. Cleansing involves the same but with some sort of liquids and juices added back. Sometimes enemas are part of the “cleanses”.

Proponents state that they get past their hunger, and that they eventually feel good, even high. They state their bowel movements show they are getting cleaned out. Their stomachs flatten and they feel light. Who wouldn’t want all this ? 

Unfortunately, it doesn’t last. Our physical and mental vitality depends on a flux of matter and energy through our body. It is true that our body is designed to weather the temporary hardship of relative drought or famine, but under these conditions it cannot thrive. 

So many people participating in cleanses or fasts are doing so to achieve optimal health and high performance. However, to really thrive, we need optimal nutrition and optimal activity as much of the time as possible. Fasting and cleanses are not compatible with this. 

What do fasting and cleanses really do ? In many cases, they are dehydrating. This can be dangerous, especially if subjects are very young, old, or unwell. The body does burn fat and glycogen for energy, but in more prolonged fasts, muscle mass is lost. This types of metabolism actually produces more “ toxins”. It does not detoxify. 

All this provides a substantial stress on the body. Stress hormones are activated. Neurotransmitters  which help us cope with stress are activated as well, accounting for the feeling of elation and capability. 

Weight does indeed get lost, but mostly in the form of water, stool, fat and and muscle. When a normal dietary and fluid intake is resumed, most of the weight is regained. Muscle of course can be rebuilt, but this requires exercise and surplus protein in the diet. 

Colon cleanses can be dangerous. The colon has a normal bacterial flora. The importance of the balance of this flora is becoming better understood these days. Colon cleanses disturb this balance and can lead to problems with digestion, dehydration and serious electrolyte abnormalities. 

I have noticed that purveyors of these unproven and dangerous methods charge high prices. I have also noticed that they advertise to vulnerable populations, including those undergoing cancer therapy. I find this very concerning. 

The answer to all of this is very simple. It is common sense evidence based medicine and health maintenance. It is Friday, and I am thinking about the weekend. So instead of going on about this downer topic, I would like to tell you my alternative version of a quick health boost. 

I call it a “spa weekend". To me, this means I will arrange to do several key things this weekend in a concerted spirit of boosting wellness. They are as follows: 

 

  • Get the ideal amount of sleep all weekend. 
  • Do morning yoga. 
  • Drink green tea each day. 
  • Drink 3 liters of water each day. 
  • Do longer afternoon workouts each day. 
  • Have 3 ideal meals and 3 ideal snacks each day all weekend, heavy on protein, veggies and fruit. 
  • Soak in the tub each day. 

I might even do my own pedicure. 

That is my idea of a plan to boost wellness. I hope you can take a spa weekend sometime soon. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wellness Wednesday: Getting Real about Wellness Coaches

"Are health coaches a real thing? What do they actually do? Something like that sounds really expensive.” In our survey two weeks ago you said the most helpful thing for your health improvement would be a health coach. Here is the lowdown on this very real and up-and-coming service.

There are a lot of coaches out there. There are a lot of health and wellness coaches out there too. As you know, I have hung out my shingle as an "evidence based" practitioner. Accordingly, if I were to get a wellness coach, I would want one that practiced evidence based coaching. 

I have done a little homework on our behalf, and found that the American College of Sports Medicine certifies only one coaching program in the country at this time, wellcoachesschool.com. Lucky for me, the medical fitness center (health club) associated with my hospital utilizes wellness coaches certified by this school.

However, I too assumed this would be on the expensive side. Here's what I found out. First of all all, prices are cheaper if you are a member of the health club, which stands to reason. Secondly, they offered different packages. The cheapest package without membership was $200 and consisted of eight sessions over eight weeks. This would provide personal training in a small group. This sort of thing would be an out of pocket expense.

On the other hand, I was pleasantly surprised to find out that the more extensive packages involving weight management and wellness coaching for those with serious or chronic medical conditions might be covered by insurance. These programs range from $250-$750 and take place over several months time. Of course any coverage by insurance would have to be determined beforehand and would have to be based on documentation in the patient's medical record by a patient’s physician, someone like me. 

Although I was encouraged by all of this, I did come away from my fact-finding with the impression that my patients who need this most are simply not going to be able to have access to this, afford it or obtain coverage for it. 

This led me to the idea of being your own coach. This is not my idea or a new idea. A simple Google search revealed several reputable sites which deal with this topic. I will share them with you now.  

How to become your own life coach with 14 simple strategies

10 ways to be your own life coach

How to be your own life coach in four easy steps

And my favorite,

Tips from the pros: how to be your own life coach

 

I am thinking about getting wellness coach certification from wellcoachesschool.com. So much of what I do in the course of the day with my patients is wellness coaching. While it is true that I deliver babies and perform female pelvic surgery, I spend a lot of time and energy trying to get my patients to be well. I would like to be as good as this as possible.

I looked into the course curriculum, and I noticed they had two key textbooks, one you get when you register for the classes, and is rather costly. The other is available on Amazon.com for a modest amount of money ( At this time a used one is $0.43 plus $3.99 for shipping. ) It is called "Organize your Mind, Organize your Life” with the subtitle,”Train your brain to get more done in less time”, by Margaret Moore and Paul Hammerness. I think this is a great place to start for people who want to be their own life coach. I know I am going to crack open this book as soon as possible. 

Beyond that I am still going to be giving continued thought to what, in practical every day terms, could help people meet their basic health goals in nutrition, fitness, and stress management.

Stay tuned for more tips on achieving wellness on next weeks Wellness Wednesday. 

Medical Monday: Weekly News Update in Obstetrics and Gynecology 

The Republican dominated House voted to defund Planned Parenthood last Friday the 19th. About a week later, the Senate rejected the same bill by a vote of 52 to 47. It turns out defunding Planned Parenthood would have allowed lawmakers to come in on budget and avoid a government shutdown on October1st. Both sides of the aisle are woking on plans to keep the government going after October 1st. I will say this: that meeting budget and funding Planned Parenthood are really two separate issues and should be treated as such. It is not as though Planned Parenthood is the ONLY straw that could have broken this camel’s back. 

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) held a public hearing this week about the relatively new method of sterilization called Essure. This procedure involves the insertion of small coils into the inner aspect of the the Fallopian tubes as they open into the uterine cavity. Is is an office procedure without incisions, which is its appeal. However there are now 5k plus reports of complications associated with the device and more pregnancies than were intially advertised. A panel of experts criticized both the maker, Bayer Health Care Pharmaceuticals, and the FDA, in the handling of device’s testing.  A long running social media campaign has influenced the convening of this hearing. 

Long acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) like IUDs ( intrauterine devices) have been found to be 20 times more effective at preventing pregnancy that all other contraceptive methods. In more good news, almost everyone, even childless women and women with medical conditions, are eligible to use them. Their use is up in the last few years from 1.3% to 7.2 %. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that they be first-line contraceptives for sexually active teens.

Most women know there is a vaccine available to prevent cervical dysplasia and cancer. But now a clinical trial from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine has shown effectiveness in a new genetically engineered vaccine to ERADICATE existing high grade precancerous cervical lesions in half of the test subjects. Wow, fantastic ! 

Stay tuned for more news from the wild world of Ob/Gyn in next’s week Medical Monday. 

Medical Monday: Weekly News Update in  Obstetrics and Gynecology

It's a mixed week in OB/GYN news, as always.

A Swedish study indicates that women who are overweight or obese at the time of the first pregnancy are more likely to develop diabetes in the next decade or two of their life. The risk of increase is six times baseline.

The eighth circuit court of appeal in St. Louis Missouri has taken the position that forcing employers to cover the cost of contraception through their insurance “ violates the groups religious freedoms".

In other news in the war on contraception, the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that cutting off funds from Planned Parenthood for one year could "reduce healthcare access for about 390,000 people" and at least through the Planned Parenthood budget with sales tax payers about $235 million. They hasten to indicate that defunding the organization could result in"several thousand unplanned births that would drive up government costs elsewhere such as in the Medicaid budget which pays for 45% of all births in this country.

The Census Bureau reports that the percentage of people without health insurance dropped in 2014 to 10.4 % down from 13.3 % the year before.

In the department of general women's health the following finding is rather striking. When comparing the cost of institutional care for male Alzheimer's patients versus women's Alzheimer's patients the following is noted. The cost of caring for women with Alzheimer's is six times greater then for a man with the same diagnosis. This is because when man has Alzheimer’s, female family members put much more time and energy into their care, saving them from expensive institutionalization. The reverse is not true when male family members take care of women with Alzheimer’s.

In other gender gap news, the Journal of the American medical Association reports that the gender gap in academic medicine is alive and well. Despite the fact that half of all medical school graduates are and have been women for sometime, Men are 15 percent more likely to have the rank of full professor. It also shows that women generally do produce less reach her research than men, But that this may be due to lack of mentorship, institutional support, and most importantly research funding through research grants. According to the same study, men received over twice as much research funding from their employers for equipment and labs. Women researchers are also less likely to receive NIH grants than there male colleagues.

For some good news this week we will have to turn to the field of vaccines. The CDC or Centers for Disease Control found that about 90% of children under the age of three were vaccinated against the common disease entities in the years between 1994 and 2013. What did this do for us? The CDC estimates that this will have prevented 732,000 early deaths in United States alone.

Finally, also in the good news department, the flu vaccine may be more effective this year according to the CDC or Centers for Disease Control. It is estimated that it will be nearly 3 times as effective as last year’s preparation. Remember that even if the vaccine doesn't prevent flu entirely, it will decrease the severity of flu which is very important in children and other vulnerable populations.

Stay tuned for more news from the world of OB/GYN next week in Medical Monday.

 

Wellness Wednesday : Your Wellness Challenges

This Wednesday I am reaching out to understand your health challenges and what could potentially help you meet them. I work with patients nearly every day and give them information about what can improve their health. Sometimes they are able to work successfully with it and sometimes not. I am fascinated with what separates the two groups. 

I have always tried to make the process of becoming healthy accessible to everyone. I am striving to learn the pertinent behavioral science behind health habits that will enable me to help you actually make those positive health changes. 

I myself am motivated by a variety of things: healthy cookbooks, exercise videos, stories of success, and even inspirational cards that sit on my desk. 

I invite you to take my survey and let me know about your challenges and what you think could help. I am most interested in your response. Click on yoga girl below to access the survey. I promise to publish results next week on Wellness Wednesday. 


Best,

Dr. Gina