Medical Monday: Breaking News from the World of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Good Monday. We start out with good news, noting findings reported at the World Diabetic Congress that those who breastfeed have a substantially lower risk of developing type two diabetes later in life. 

Northern hemisphere readers will note that the CDC ( Centers for Disease Control) has reported that this year's flu activity, so far, is relatively low. They also note that slow starts aren't unusual and those that haven’t yet gotten a flu shot should get one, especially since this year’s vaccine is good match. 

USPTF (The United States Preventive Services Task Force) has once again released it’s version of guidelines for breast cancer screening. They are, predictably, lax, and recommend individualization for women of average risk before age of 50, and every other year between 50 and 74. They have chosen this age range of screening since they state their data show this is the age range “ of greatest benefit” from mammograms. This is no doubt true since this is when most cancers are diagnosed. However, what they cannot seem to understand is that women want ALL the benefit that mammograms can confer. Think about it. Their recommendations would condemn any woman below 50 of average risk to having her cancer detected only when it became palpable. Of course mammograms detect them far earlier, when they are more curable. 

Women want ALL the benefits mammograms can confer, and yes, they understand all such diagnostic tests must be weighed against their risks. But in this case, the risks are so small. They are the risks of biopsies for concerning findings which come back negative for cancer. They are also, according to the USPTF, the risks of fear and discomfort of the procedure. I have seen two and a half decades of patients and I have never heard one patient cite these risks as even coming close to outweighing the benefit of screening for cancer. Where does the USPTF get the idea that these particular risks are so important or that women even care that much about them ?

The good news is that the controversy has hit the airwaves and the blogosphere. NBC, the Washington Post, the NY Times, and Newsweek, among others, all covered it. ACOG (The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) maintains a recommendation of annual mammograms after 40, and the American Cancer Society recommends annual mammograms from 45 on. ACOG plans to convene a conference to sort out the issue once and for all. 

Group B strep is an important pathogen for moms and newborns. A new vaccine against it is under development. 

Big news: Ovarian cancer actually seems to arise in the tubes. The data for this is sufficiently compelling that ACOG is recommending removal of the tubes with preservation of the ovaries when applicable. 

The CDC reports that the average age of first time mom’s is at an all time high, being 26 years and 4 months. This can be attributed, at least in part, to fewer teen pregnancies. 

In sobering news, a new virus called Zika is causing birth defects in the Caribbean and South America. It is spread through mosquitos. The CDC may warn pregnant women not to travel in that region. I’m sure we’ll hear more about efforts to deal with this in the near future. 

The effort to develop personalized vaccines to treat ovarian cancer is in the early stages. This work is on the desk of the FDA as we speak. 

Wow, so much happening ! Stay tuned for more breaking news from the world of Obstetrics and Gynecology next week on medical Monday. 

Food Friday: Staples of the Fridge and Freezer

As promised, this week we are going to see how the healthy fridge and freezer look. The lists below are my idea of what you will need to put together healthy meals and snacks all week long for you and your family.

Take a critical look at your fridge and freezer. How healthy are the contents ? Can you tell what the contents are, or how old they are ? Let’s hope so, otherwise send it to the compost. Take a gratifying step further and clean out the whole refrigerator. Here are some tips to having what you need, being sure of it’s safety, and making it easy to prepare healthy meals and snacks. 

• Shop twice a week
• Buy only healthy items such as those listed here. 
• Make a deliberate point to use what you buy. Do not plan a meal without looking in the fridge first. Factor in the what needs to be used as well as the balance of the meal. Do not, however,  be tempted to save a couple bucks and use questionable items. 
• Make sure to have a set of good clean containers to use for subdividing bulk purchases and for storing leftovers. Containers which hide their contents tend to go unused and spoil. 
• Have a couple sizes of ziplock bags also for subdividing bulk purchases and for storing leftovers. Sometimes it’s easier to store things this way instead of in a giant clear box. 
• Label and date all your unlabelled containers. 
• Search for recipes or even techniques which use your healthy ingredients, and keep them simple. 
• Use your freezer to enhance your nutrition. Buy good food on sale, in bulk and in season, divide it strategically and freeze it. 

Here are some healthy contents which should be in your fridge and freezer. 

The freezer

nuts: i.e. cashews, pecans, almonds, walnuts

pestos in ziplock bags

frozen concentrated juices i.e. orange juice concentrate for sauces

chili paste, clearly labelled

coffee or cacao (raw chocolate) bean

bags of frozen fruits, home made or store bought, for pie, cobbler, tarts, smoothies

frozen vegetables such as corn and peas

fish, meats, poultry, in bulk or divided by you into single servings

bulk items like ziplock bags of garlic cloves

ziplocks of good leftovers which you can’t use quickly enough

dried fruits which are moist and apt to spoil

cheeses : block parmesan, shredded cheddar, shredded parmesan

ice creams and sorbets

The refrigerator

Dairy:  

milk, half and half, cream, butter,

certain oils like toasted sesame  

soft cheese: cottage cheese, cream cheese, ricotta, mozzarella

hard cheese: cheddar, pre-sliced and shredded, shredded real parmesan

eggs- at least two dozen

Meats, poultry and fish which are thawing, marinating, preserved, or leftover. 

Cultures for home made yogurt, yeast to make bread

Vegetables:  

salad greens like romaine, spinach, arugula, cooking greens like kale and chard,

Hard vegetables like carrots, beets, cabbage, broccoli, asparagus, zucchini, cucumbers,

red and other various colored peppers

vegetables ad infinitum  

Fruits:

Strawberries, blackberries, blueberries, other soft fruits like pitted fruits, i.e. peaches, apricots, etc (Tomatoes, bananas, apple and oranges are stored at room temperature ) 

Condiments:

pickles, sweet and dill, olives, ketchup, mustards, mayonnaise, salad dressings, opened jams, jellys, chutneys, salsas, Worchestershire sauce, soy sauce, Siracha or other hot sauce, lime and lemon juice, fresh ginger, garlic

It takes some time to adjust your meal planning, cooking and eating habits to include all the good things all of the time and very few of the bad things very seldom. But having fridge, freezer, and pantry filled properly will help. It is also necessary to realize that healthy eating takes a little extra time at first. But healthy cooking, once learned is minimalistic simple cooking, and can be made to be very time efficient. 

I hope these lists will help healthy eating become easy and enjoyable. 

Wellness Wednesday: Workout Shoes

Since last week’s Wellness Wednesday post, you have all, no doubt, done your week long analysis of how you spend your time. I trust you have been able to scrounge up 30 minutes per day, 6 days per week, for some real exercise.

After time, the next thing you’ll be needing is decent exercise shoes. So I thought I would make a brief post about choosing workout shoes, which should pique your interest in studying the matter further and help you steer clear of expensive trendy nonsense. 

I have consulted the world renowned authority Footlocker. No, actually, the American College of Sports Medicine has put out some nice pamphlets which I will share with you, and you will have the knowledge you need. Before those links I’d like to throw out a few factoids to, as I said, get you interested. 

• 85% of people wear shoes which are too small. 
• Shoes should be purchased later in the day when feet are the largest. 
• Running shoes should have minimal drop between the heel and toe. 
• Excessive padding, “ motion control” or “ stability” components interfere with a normal foot's motion, but those with flat feet may need “ motion control” shoes. Those with very high arches may need more cushioning. 
• A woman’s shoe of size 8 or less should weigh 8 ounces or less. 
• Pronation while running is normal; it is a natural shock absorber. Stopping normal pronation may cause foot or knee problems.
• There should be at least half inch between the toes and the end of the shoe. 
• Running shoes need to be replaced every  350 miles or so. 
• When you buy new workout shoes, break them in gradually. 

Links: 

ASCM information on Selecting Running Shoes

ASCM information on Selecting and Effectively Using Running Shoes

Next week in Wellness Wednesday: Workout Clothes

Have a great week !

Medical Monday: Breaking News from the World of Ob/Gyn

2016 brings in some good news for women’s health. Physicians are starting to weigh in on the new over the counter contraceptives available in Oregon and California, and they are overwhelmingly applauding it. 

A recent article in the Los Angeles Times also indicates physicians are also weighing in on the controversy on mammogram frequency recommendations, and many support annual screening from the age of 40. This view is supported by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Radiology and the National Comprehensive Cancer Care Network. 

The National Public Radio Health Blog Shots has indication that 2015 was the year “ menstruation came out of the closet. They cite the care of Kiran Gandhi who finished the New York Marathon on her period,without pads, drawing publicity to the idea that #PeriodsAreNotAnInsult. They cite other instances where menstruation entered polite public conversation, thereby beginning to erode long held taboos. 

The FDA now classifies mesh for prolapse as a "high risk device". Given the complication rates, I think this is a good thing. Also good is that the FDA excluded mesh for incontinence which is a different device entirely and works rather well, without the same high complication rate. 

You may hear of a retrospective observational study has picked up an association between the use of oral fluconazole (Diflucan) in the first 6 months of pregnancy with a 50% increased risk of miscarriage. From this data, it is not at all possible to say whether the diflucan is causing these miscarriages. Think about it…. maybe it is the yeast itself, or a diet high in sugar. More study is needed to figure this out. 

A new blood test may help physicians sort out those at risk for preeclampsia. This is most welcome since it is sometimes difficult to discern preeclampsia from chronic hypertension. 

Finally, in some really fantastic news, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) has published research indicating that even “ older women” i.e. 69 or older, who get regular mammograms have a lower likelihood of dying from breast cancer during the ages of 75-84 compared to their counterparts who did not get regular mammograms. Currently we are permitted to stop screening around 70 and the US Preventive Services Task Force says mammograms should not be done after 75. This has to do with supposedly having an expectation of living less that another ten years. You know, something tells me this whole line of thinking is going to evolve as women live longer and more vital lives. I wonder what Betty White, Angela Lansbury, Sandra O’Connor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg or Dame Maggie Smith would have to say about all this. 

Medical Monday: Breaking News from the World of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Good Monday and Happy New Year. ACOG (The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) has once again reiterated the newer recommendations regarding cervical cancer screening. They have stated that “ Women ages 30 to 65 at "average risk" for cervical cancer should receive co-testing with cytology and HPV testing every five years or screening with cytology every three years”. ( Cytology just means sending cells with a pap and co-testing means DNA testing for HPV, Human Papilloma Virus via the same sample.) I would like to emphasize a couple of aspects of this statement: the phrase “ average risk”, and the idea that they are talking about sending specimens to the lab. 

Average risk is not precisely defined, and this is ok, since it gives clinicians room for applying clinical judgement to individual patient cases. Average risk does not certainly include those patients, who are by virtue of disease or medication, immunocompromised. It does not include those who have recently had precancerous cells in the cervix, vagina or vulva. In my opinion it does not include those who have a significant smoking habit, since smoking is tightly associated with accelerating the progress of HPV disease. I do not believe average risk includes those with alcohol or drug problems since these patients can have poor immune function and struggle with satisfying recommended follow up protocols. In my opinion, average risk also should not include those with high risk sexual habits, such as having unprotected sex or large numbers of partners. But does the media ever highlight any of these things ? I have not seen it. 

These ACOG recommendations are about the recommended sampling frequency for cells on the cervix. They are not a statement about the frequency of annual exams or even pelvic exams. Those proceed on their own schedules for their own separate indications. The media has not done a good job at highlighting this important distinction. After all, a woman is more than just her cervix. 

The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) has received a request from a group of researchers to retract their own study from the Journal on the grounds that they have discovered that the lead researcher has falsified data about the usefulness of nitroglycerin for improving bone density.  Kudos to those whistleblower researchers. 

South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) will revise its regulations concerning the practices of licensed midwives, what we call lay midwives, meaning those who are not Certified Nurse Midwives. The DHEC was picketed by about 50 midwives. ACOG has said that while women deserve the right to chose where they deliver, they should be informed of the risks and benefits of the choices, including the two to threefold risk of neonatal death while delivering outside the hospital. (This data came from a study reported in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) and involved a study of 80,000 pregnancies in Oregon.)

Let’s think a little more about that statistic on neonatal death. Neonatal death is defined as the baby dying in labor or in the first month after birth. Why would such a terrible thing happen in the hospital ? High risk pregnant patients come to the hospital. High risk mothers may have very early labor, ruptured membranes, or severe preeclampsia, all resulting in deliveries so early that babies are far more apt to die or have serious morbidities. This is the source of neonatal death in the hospital, not the average pregnant women who comes in for labor or induction.  On the other hand, most licensed lay midwives restrict their practice to low risk patients, with none of these aforementioned problems. And yet many more of their patients end up with dead babies, despite the fact that hospital caregivers are dealing with these sometimes insurmountable obstacles. Problems which are solved by a simple medication in the IV, or the use of forceps, or even a C Section in the hospital, result in death when the same problems occur outside the hospital.

Speaking of neonatal death being two to three times more prevalent among those who birth at home, did you ever consider that this is a group average ? What happens when you unpack that group ? It turns out that first timers delivering at home have a 14 fold increase risk of first apgar score of ZERO, which is tantamount to neonatal death. And while the multiparous patients (women with multiple prior births) may do better with labor, they are much more prone to hemorrhages and other maternal complications, which are not even addressed in this statistic. 

So beware of the medical reporting in the popular media. Don’t take those statistics at face value. Remember the actual human realities behind them. 

Stay tuned for more breaking news from the world of Obstetrics and Gynecology next week on Medical Monday. 

Medical Monday: Breaking News from the World of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Medical Headlines took a bit of holiday break just like us, so today’s report will be brief. 

The Journal of Pediatrics recently presented research that has shown that many new parents use car seats incorrectly. The most common mistakes are straps too lose and chest clips placed too low. Anyone with doubts can just stop by any labor and delivery or pediatric clinic for an on the spot demonstration of the correct technique. 

In the good idea department, the American Journal of Public Health reports that young pregnant women  might get significant benefits with group prenatal care. The study groups ranged in age between 14-21 and received either traditional prenatal care or group prenatal care. Those receiving care in the group setting were 33 % less likely to have a small for gestational age baby. Personally I think it would be fun to instruct young women in a group setting. 

In the frustrating and dangerous section, Reuters has reported on Canadian study retrospectively comparing 11,000 low risk women who had home birth with 11,000 low risk women with hospital birth. Their endpoints were still birth or death. For these endpoints, there was no significant difference in outcomes, with the incidence at home being 1.5/1000 versus 0.94/1000 in the hospital. There are two glaring problems with drawing a conclusion from this: 

1. The incidence of stillbirth and neonatal death is small in both cases, so comparisons of even large numbers cases are relatively unrevealing.

2. We care about many more outcomes than still birth or neonatal death. For example, we care about near death of the baby or the mother, brain damage, post partum hemorrhage, retained placenta, postpartum infection, and so many more grave life altering things. The truth of the matter is that neonatal and perinatal medicine is so good now that no matter how badly a case is managed, modern medicine can almost always salvage it enough so that it does not qualify as a stillbirth or a neonatal death. Badly managed cases requiring intensive perinatal and or neonatal care that do not result in stillbirth or death are definitely things I should think everyone would want to avoid, but nonetheless are NOT on the radar of this study. For that matter badly managed cases that require intensive perinatal and or neonatal care that do not result in stillbirth or death but that DO result in bad outcomes like brain damage are not also reflected in this study’s conclusions. How helpful is that ? And yet, what is the Reuter’s headline ? “ Home Births May Be Safe For Low Risk Pregnancies “ Really ?

From the “ clues on the trail” department, we have the following two tantalizing tidbits. One, it turns out that there is some sort of association between gum disease and breast cancer. Those with gum disease have a 14% increased risk of the disease. Add smoking and it jumps to 20-30 % and that means smoking ANYTIME in the last 20 years. Yikes ! information like this could ultimately help us understand how breast cancer arises or persists. 

Two, Metformin, a common medication to help with ovulatory dysfunction, polycystic ovary syndrome, carbohydrate intolerance, and diabetes, “can block the release of toxins from the placenta when preeclampsia is present." Wow cool. Now someone smart needs to figure out why.

Ending with heartwarming news, the journal Pediatrics has presented research showing that “ kangaroo care” benefits premature and underweight babies in several measurable ways. Kangaroo care is prolonged skin to skin contact, and it is associated with half the risk of serious infection, 78% lower risk of low core temperature, and 88% lower risk of dangerously low blood sugar. 

So go hug your kid and have a happy new year. 

Medical Monday: Breaking News from the World of Obstetrics and Gynecology

This weeks news is all about the facts and figures. Statistics is like pie. It is all about how you cut it. That is to say, the real meaning of raw data is challenging to correctly interpret. A great deal of the message from a study depends on how the data is presented. Be wary about drawing conclusions from studies where none can be drawn. 

The CDC report indicates that the number of abortions in the United States has hit a record low compared to 1990. This is true for all ethnic groups.

A new study has hit the press indicating that use of SSRIs, common antidepressants, in the first trimester is NOT associated with increased risk of autism spectrum disorders. Nonetheless the study also showed babies whose mother’s took SSRIs were 75% more likely to get autism than than their peers. Whether this is related to the mom’s condition, the medication or something else is totally unknown and cannot be known from this study. 

In the strange, counterintuitive and questionable department, a new observational study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association shows more complications among those with a planned C section compared to those with an emergency C section done after labor. This is against what has been show before, and against common sense. Authors at the NYT Blog Well speculate that somehow the labor is “ good” for babies. You just as well might speculate that people who chose elective C sections are less healthy to begin with. No conclusions can be drawn, although many will be. 

New findings in the Journal Cancer Epidemiology show that while cancer rates are declining in developed countries, they are increasing in the developing parts of the world. With development comes smoking, and more obesity, which increase the risk for certain cancers. 

The now ancient Women’s Health Initiative, which gathered data on a great many things, has been mined once again. This time it has revealed an association between smoking and infertility. No surprises there. 

I guess I am not the only one who doubts the work of the USPTSF on the issue of breast cancer screening and mammograms. Over 60 lawmakers, headed by Representative Debbie Schultz of Florida, have included a provision in the new budget requiring that the US government officially recommends breast cancer screenings at age 40 rather than 50 as the UPTSF does. Looks like they feel American women are willing to undergo some increased anxiety and discomfort in exchange for earlier detection, longer life, and less mortality. 

A new study out of Britain once again raises the question as to whether the use of the Ca 125 blood test can help detect ovary cancer and save lives. The results are by no means conclusive, but they will provide an impetus for much needed additional study. 

Back to pie. This week I hope you have several kinds, pumpkin, cherry and whatever is your favorite. Merry Christmas week ! 

Medical Monday: Breaking News from the World of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Until recently, the only treatment for preeclampsia is delivery. However, a new study is underway to test Recombinant Human Antithrombin to manage early onset ( 23-30 weeks) preeclampsia. As the same suggests, this medication acts by inhibiting abnormal blood clotting and inflammation, two components of preeclampsia. If this helps, this will be the first medication to directly address this common and serious disease. 

In the unbelievable department, The Government Accountability Department (GAO) has discovered something concerning at the National Institute of Health (NIH) . They have discovered that the NIH does not, in their research, always keep data on sex, thereby making it impossible to determine whether or not an intervention or exposure affects men and women differently. Those of us from the world of Ob/Gyn can tell you that rather often, the same factor will affect men quite differently than it will affect women. 

Here’s your reference http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-16-13

The Radiologic Society of North America heard research results indicating that the recent Medicaid Expansion has boosted rates of breast cancer screening in low income women. Assuming these and other women do not pay too much attention to the USPSTF ( US Preventive Services Task Force) recommendations of later and less frequent mammograms, we may soon see increased rates of early detection and eventually, longer survival. 

ACOG (The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) has made its strongest statement yet on pregnancy, stating not only that it is safe, but that it is recommended on a daily basis and should be the norm. 

OB/GYNS all over the world are nodding on this one. The Journal of the American Medical association has indicated the WHO's (World Health Organization) optimal rate of C section at 10% is too low. As C section rates rise to 15%, the study shows maternal and infant deaths decrease. In fact, maternal and infant deaths continue to decline through about 19%. This is the sweet spot, meaning where maternal and infant well being are at their highest. In the US about 33% of births happen by C section. This probably has to do with many things, including our culture, patient preference, doctor’s risk tolerance, the medico-legal climate, and the obesity epidemic. We can improve. 

Sobering : False positive mammograms may be linked to a higher risk of breast cancer later in life. The group in question is those whose mammograms indicate the need for a biopsy but then whose biopsies are negative. These women, despite negative biopsies, have a 39 % higher risk of breast cancer in their future that women who didn’t require a biopsy. I wonder how this finding will factor in to the recommended frequency of mammograms. So many authorities are weighing in on how frequently they should be done. ACOG still says every 1-2 years after 40. 

It turns out that giving flu vaccine to pregnant women in the second and third trimester benefits not only the mom but at least have of the unborn babies as well. Bonus ! 

Stay tuned next week for more breaking news from the world of Ob/Gyn ! 

Medical Monday: Breaking News from the World of Obstetrics and Gynecology

California and Oregon will soon allow pharmacists to screen patients and prescribed birth control pills. While the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists considers this a step in right direction, they believe they should be available over-the-counter, plain and simple. While it is true that low dose combination birth control pills can have medical complications in a very small percent of people, by and large their health benefits far outweigh their risks.

As most of you probably are already aware, hepatitis C has a new medical treatment which provides a cure in a very high percentage of people. However, hepatitis B has remained a challenge, and in particular, we have had to deal with the problem of vertical passage of the virus from mother to baby during pregnancy, labor and delivery. However recently at the meetings of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, new research was presented. In the course of a randomized controlled trial, a drug called Tenofovir was shown to be able to reduce vertical transmission. 

Yet another encouraging recommendation about exercise in pregnancy has been released. According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, nearly half of US women gain too much weight while they're pregnant. We all know that women who gain too much weight in pregnancy are very uncomfortable. However they also have higher rates of miscarriage, premature birth, stillbirth, and babies with birth defects. They’re also more likely to have heart problems, sleep apnea, gestational or pregnancy associated diabetes, preeclampsia also known as toxemia, and abnormal blood clots. They are at higher risk for cesarean section. So there are ample reasons to find ways to control this weight gain. 

The new memo released by ACOG advises pregnant women to exercise regularly and more often than they currently do. The memo states that while walking is the best exercise, jogging, Pilates, yoga, cycling, swimming, and other forms of exercise are perfectly acceptable. ACOG cautions against contact sports such as skiing, and other specialized sports such as scuba diving.

More good news: it appears that breast-feeding for two months or more reduces a gestational diabetic’s risk of developing type II diabetes later in life by 50 %. Moreover, the risk of diabetes lessens as the patients breast-fed longer.

Finally, here is some good news that initially sounds a lot like bad news. Since 2010, there has been a significant increase in the number of women under age 26 who have received a diagnosis of early-stage cervical cancer. In the next age group, 26-34, the numbers were unchanged. What changed for the younger age group? The answer is the availability of insurance. One of the features of the ACA, The affordable care act, was to allow children to stay on their parents insurance plans through the age of 26. Most likely the increase in diagnoses came from increased compliance with recommended screening, i.e. pap smears. Once again, we are reminded that appropriate screening leads to early diagnosis, which leads to less invasive treatments, fewer complications, and higher rates of cure. 

Stay tuned for more breaking news from the world of OB/GYN next week on Medical Monday.

Medical Monday: Breaking News from the World of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Happy Monday on this short week ! This week in honor of Thanksgiving I plan to apply the filter of gratitude to the news that I feature. Let’s see how this works out. 

The LA Times recently reported on the actual C Section rate in the US ( 33%)  as compared to the theoretical ideal of 15 %. An ACOG (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) spokesman indicated that this discrepancy was largely about risk tolerance of the involved parties. Gratefulness filter: Le’t be glad we live in a place where C sections are readily available to those who need them. 

Findings coming out of the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study indicate that black women with the healthiest diets were 34 % less likely to develop ovarian cancer that their counterparts who ate the most unhealthy diet. Gratefulness filter: Diet is an easy factor to modify !

Findings presented at the American College of Rheumatology indicate that Denosumab was superior to Zoledronic Acid ( Zometa) at restoring low bone density due to osteoporosis. Gratefulness filter: This is great news for all with low bone density ! 

The Supreme Court rejects the case against Planned Parenthood. Justices Scalia and Thomas dissent. Gratefulness filter: Let is be glad we live in a country that respects free speech of differing parties, that observes due process and the rule of law. 

About 10 % of all new mothers suffer from post partum depression. New York is rolling out a ambitious program which will require that all expectant and new mothers will be screened for depression. Gratefulness filter: Thank goodness awareness is increasing about this important and treatable problem. 

Rhode Island has a new state mandate requiring HPV vaccine for youngsters. Nearly three quarters of seventh graders received it by the start of the school year. Gratefulness filter: Thank goodness we have a way to prevent cervical cancer. 

Count your blessings this week and stay tuned for more news from the world of OB/Gyn next week on Medical Monday ! 

Medical Monday: Breaking News from the World of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health

The HPV vaccine has recently been vetted at the European Medicines Agency (EMA, the equivalent of the FDA). The EMA concluded that the benefits of Cervarix and Gardisil outweigh the risks. CDC (Center for Disease Control) Director Tom Frieden estimates that increasing the HPV vaccination rate to 80% would prevent 50,000 cases of cervical cancer in women.

Echoing results from last week, a study published in the Journal Hypertension has shown that those who had high blood pressure in pregnancy double their risk to develop the condition later in life. For diabetes, the risk quadruples.

Our largest and most foundational study on postmenopausal hormone therapy, the Women's Health initiative, (2002) was noteworthy for the fact that overall “estrogen plus progestin hormone replacement therapy" increased risk of "heart disease and breast cancer”.

Well the devil is always in the details, and sometimes angels too. It turns out that age makes a big difference the development of heart disease risk. If you “unpack" the data, you will see that women between the ages of 50 and 59 actually had a protective benefit to using hormone therapy, while women over 60 did not have the same advantage. Is interesting to remember that in this study all study participants  had never before taken any postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy. Therefore those who were 60 and older entering the study were beginning their hormone therapy approximately 10 years after the onset of menopause. Some researchers believe that it is that block of time after menopause but before initiation of hormone therapy in which silent atherosclerotic developed. If this is true then cardiovascular disease manifesting during the course the study would not really have been caused by the hormone replacement under study. Optimistic speculation leads us to wonder if women over 60 would do as well as their younger counterparts if they're hormone therapy has been started at the onset of menopause. It would be nice to know whether or not it is the youth of the women that caused them to do well with hormone therapy in their 50s or the fact that they started their hormone therapy immediately after the beginning of menopause.

It is interesting to note that age at the beginning of the study did not affect a woman's risk of breast cancer. Use of "estrogen plus progestin hormone replacement therapy” was and is clearly associated with increasing risk of breast cancer. (The same cannot be said for those who are able to use estrogen alone as their hormone therapy.) The lead investigator in this most recent study, Dr. Joanne Manson, indicated that "for every 1000 women per year not using hormone therapy, about 3 develop breast cancer” versus 4 out of “every 1000 women” using combined estrogen plus progestin hormone therapy.

A recent study has shown that only about half of women visited the dentist during pregnancy. Dental care in pregnancy is critical since many oral and tooth diseases have a direct impact on the pregnancy including increased risk of preterm labor.

Former Republican representative from Georgia Phil Gingrey has criticized the recent US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)  recommendations on mammography citing the differing recommendations of the USPSTF, the American Cancer Society, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. He has urged for more time to study the basis of these differing recommendations, so that we can "analyze the research and arrive at a medical consensus”. He has introduced a bill entitled “Protect Access to Life-saving Screenings”, (PALS). This bill would place a two year moratorium on the USPSTF recommendations.

I am all for this and I dare say a great deal of unpacking the data will be necessary here. What will be important in the conversation is identifying the “harms" of screening. And please don't talk to me or the breast cancer survivors in my life about fear of and pain from mammograms, which have been cited by the USPSTF as harms. Besides this, it will also be imperative to study endpoints, not only survival, meaning and lack of death, but years of life. It seems like a subtle distinction but it seems to have been lost on the US Preventive Services Task Force thus far.

Support has come out for treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism (low thyroid) in pregnancy. A new study presented at the International Thyroid Congress has shown that treatment with synthroid or Levothyroxine in pregnancy for those with subclinical hypothyroidism “was associated with decreased low birth weight and Apgar scores". It was not however associated with a significant decrease in miscarriage. This will probably tip the wobbling scales in favor of universal thyroid testing in pregnancy. 

Any study recently published in the December issue of Obstetrics and Gynecology has shown that yoga is safe even late in pregnancy. Study participants were put through various yoga postures and measurements were taken of heart rate, blood pressure and other vital signs for mother and or baby. Although mothers often opted for various modifications of their poses, no ill effects were found.

In more happy news, the United Nations and the World Bank jointly issued a report Thursday noting that maternal death rates have dropped 43% worldwide since 1990. This is attributed to better access to higher quality health and sex education services.

Stay tuned for more news from the world of OB/GYN and women's health, next week on Medical Monday.

Medical Monday: Breaking News from the World of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health

Happy Monday ! This week, in addition to reading the news and doing your normal workweek, you get to start seriously preparing for the holidays.  Enjoy the process !

Postpartum depression is in the news again, and this is a good thing. “ Shots” blog by NPR ( National Public Radio ) has run a story about a woman, Paige Bellenbaum,  who went through this. She has since recovered and has become an activist on the subject, and helped to write a bill in New York “ aimed at educating more families on the symptoms of maternal depression.” The bill also promotes screening through the Pediatrician's office. Early treatment for postpartum depression is, of course, more effective. 

Research findings presented at the NCI ( National Cancer Institute’s) annual conference underscored that increasing parity ( the more children you have ) reduces risk of ovarian cancer. The first child reduces the change of this cancer10% and each subsequent birth reduces it 8% more. While no one would decide the number of children they wanted based on this, it is interesting and may spur further research about how ovarian cancer comes into being the first place. Hopefully this will ultimately yield clues on how to prevent and treat this awful disease. 

New research published in the Journal of Diabetes Care indicates that women with central obesity (higher levels of abdominal fat) are more likely to develop pregnancy associated diabetes here. Of course it is also known that women who get gestational ( pregnancy associated diabetes) are more likely to get Type 2 Diabetes later in life. Moral of the story: Get in good shape and at your correct weight before pregnancy and in-between each delivery. 

Also hot on the trail of gestational diabetes (GDM), s study presented at the Conference of the Society for Endocrinology indicates that women who are sedentary in the first trimester are more likely to get GDM. They defined sedentary as sitting more than 6.5 hours per day. Has anyone ever tried a standing desk ? Personally I think the best thing at work is to alternate siting and walking about at frequent intervals. Also naps, mid afternoon. Wouldn’t that be cool ? 

The CDC ( Center for Disease Control) reports that half of pregnant women are gaining too much weight in their pregnancy. IOM ( Institute of Medicine ) recommendations indicate women with a normal BMI ( body mass index) gain about 18.5 an 24.9pounds. Smaller women should gain more and larger women should gain less. 

Wow this week's news sure had some common themes. 

To help you stay in the know very quickly, don’t miss Medical Monday.

Medical Monday: Weekly News Update in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Good Monday.

A new study presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists suggested light meals during labor may be safe for most women. Ordinarily we would like to restrict intake to clear liquids nothing at all depending on the risk level of the woman. The main concern here is the risk of aspiration which means inhaling food particles from the stomach into the respiratory tract. Pregnant women are at increased risk for aspiration compared to non-pregnant women due to  the pressure from the baby and the relaxation of the esophageal muscles. Moreover, women are often nauseous during labor, increasing risk. The highest concern comes if the patient needs to go to cesarean section. In this instance she needs to be on her back with only a slight tilt, and this increases the risk of aspiration even further. It is unfortunate that the lay reporting makes it sound like we fear that women might aspirate during normal labor. Our concern is mostly having to do with the chance that they will go to cesarean section on a full stomach. 

Shots Blog on NPR covered this interesting tidbit: Babies and mothers exchange cells each others circulation during pregnancy labor and delivery, And they are maintained in circulation thereafter. These are believed to have implications for cancer and auto immune diseases that affect women. It is unclear whether these are beneficial, harmful, or both, depending on the circumstances. 

We know that when people have more testosterone in their system that they are more assertive or aggressive. But we are now finding is that the converse is also true. According to a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, our testosterone levels rise in response to assertive behavior such as the use of power in a work situation. Study noted that this is especially true in women.

Did you know that tobacco use before pregnancy and in pregnancy is associated with cleft palette and congenital heart defects? The CDC's National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities performed a meta-analysis which indicated that 6% of oral clefts and 1.4% of non-syndromic heart defects are attributable to maternal smoking in the first trimester. 

Yet another study underscores the fact that drinking alcohol increases a woman's risk of breast cancer.

Got cold sores? Don’t feel bad. The World Health Organization estimates that half of the world’s population under 50 does too. 

Stay tuned for more news from the world of obstetrics and gynecology, Next week on Medical Monday.

Food Friday: Trick or Alternative Treats

Ever wonder what you could give out instead of just candy ? I have worked on this challenge before at Easter when filling eggs, but have not until now considered what alternatives I could do at Halloween. 

First of all your Halloween alternative offerings should not break the bank. Secondly they should be age specific. In my family and group of friends, everyone from young children to old adults go out for the holiday, usually in costume. Halloween has always been a big holiday for our family, but especially since our youngest child was born on that day 22 years ago. When he was tiny he used to think the whole town came out for his birthday. 

I am for a strategy where you actually hand out the treat rather than have people take it from an unattended bowl on your porch. You will see why when you see my list of alternatives. Some are definitely age specific. Plus you ought to get to know your neighbors.

I think it is important to have some candy at Halloween. Always choose something that is wrapped so that the parent or child can be sure that has not been handled. You might think that the candy would get cherry picked out. This will not be the case if you were the one doing the handing out. Moreover, at Easter, I have found that some of the other non-food items are actually more popular than the candy.

Here's the list:

• Tiny boxes of raisins
• Trinkets you've purchased for cheap at the thrift store
• Interesting buttons purchased by the jar at garage sales or thrift stores
• Tiny spools of thread purchased by the bag at the fabric store
• Craft items such as decorative pipe cleaners or pom-poms
• Glass “Jewels”, meaning the pretty glass rocks you put in the bottom of a vase of flowers, Usually available at the dollar store in a selection of sizes and colors.
• Stickers
• Glow bracelets usually available at the dollar store.
• Poems quotes or sayings written decoratively and in tiny envelopes
• My favorite: beads, especially large ones.
• Tiny rolls of ribbon
• Tiny toy soldiers or animals 
• Office supplies such as decorative clips, rubber bands, tip erasers, or pencils
• Tea light candles

Basically I pick things I would like to get. Speaking of me, as you can see from the picture, I am still working hard on my costume. Guess who I am going to be.  

Have a safe happy Halloween. 

Medical Monday: Weekly News Update in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Good Monday !

I am returning from a great five days back at Stanford with our son Forest, who is now also an alumni. We attended “ Classes without Quizzes” and enjoyed ourselves immensely. We learned about numerous things, including a little about the way the brain functions during early language development, the latest in nutrition research, and a MMOG, yes, a massive multiplayer online game called EteRNA which has become a powerful tool in the design of tiny RNA machines which may be used to treat disease. We also took a yoga Piyo Hip Hop Fusion class, went on a pro multi-ethnic eating tour and saw tons of old friends. 

So now we return inspired, excited to move the needle forward in everything we do, including Medical Mondays ! 

Flibanserin went on sale this last Saturday. Flibanserin is of course the pill to treat low libido in women. It goes by the name Addyi. Does anyone know how to pronounced this ? Someone got paid to think of that name, you know. I can’t wait to see the commercials. For some real information about this drug, please see my prior post HERE. 

This week, in a 2000 word opinion piece in the New York Times, a political scientist Courtney Jung, criticized breast feeding activists for putting too much pressure on women to breastfeed. She states broad based research indicates the benefits of breastfeeding are  “ modest”. Could this op ed have anything to do with the fact that she is releasing a sensational new book called “Lactivism” next month ? Imagine running a 2000 word ad for your upcoming book in the New York Times. I wonder if they even paid her for her ad.

Her subtitle includes many of us: 

How Feminists and Fundamentalists, Hippies and Yuppies, and Physicians and Politicians Made Breastfeeding Big Business and Bad Policy

I am just going to go out here on a limb and disagree and say that I do not think breastfeeding is bad policy. I guess I’m kind of a rebel that way. 

The American Academy of Pediatricians has come out saying that "no amount of alcohol is safe for unborn babies". The new guideline “identifies prenatal exposure to alcohol as the leading preventable causes birth defects and intellectual disabilities in children.” It was previously thought that "a small amount" of alcohol is okay in pregnancy. According to the CDC (The Centers for Disease Control), about 10% of women self-report that they drink alcohol in pregnancy. So in my simplistic mind this means that if women comply with this recommendation, 10% of the entire next crop of babies could be significantly developmentally better off than the last group. Wouldn’t this have staggeringly good effects on the population ? 

The American Cancer Society has revised its recommendations for mammograms once again stating that they should start at age 45 in a patient of average risk, and go to every other year at the age of 55, provided that the woman is expected to live at least 10 more years. The purpose here is to "eliminate false positives and over treatment’.

Has anyone ever considered asking the question, How bad is the badness of a false positive? And what do they mean by overtreatment? Do they mean biopsies which turn out to be benign or do they mean lumpectomies or mastectomies? Most physicians do not consider a biopsy to be a treatment. Most patients consider a benign result a great relief. I have never heard of a patient saying ”Doctor, my biopsy was benign. It looks like I really didn't need that biopsy after all ”. If biopsies were taken out of the “over treatment “ calculations would there really be any unnecessary “treatments” left to lament ?

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has maintained their stance on mammograms every one to two years from the age of 40 forward. It also recommends a clinical breast exam annually. The American Cancer Society is dropping their recommendation for an annual clinical breast exam since it has not"been shown to save lives.” They say nothing about whether it extends lives. Is important for readers to know that there are many studies designed to determine whether or not a certain intervention prevents death in the course of the study. Preventing death is the same thing as saving life, no matter if you die at one year or ten years after treatment.  Studies geared to show an interventions ability to save life do not necessarily have the power to show it extends life. ACOG keeps its position on mammograms and clinical breast exams because earlier more frequent mammograms and clinical breast exams are associated with earlier diagnosis and longer life after breast cancer. 

I had better stop writing since there is steam coming out of my keyboard and my ears again. 

Stay tuned for more news from the wacky world of OB/GYN next week on Medical Monday. 

Medical Monday: Weekly News Update in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Did you know that some insurance companies offer rebate incentives to get indicated mammograms ? A recent editorial in the Journal of the American Medical Association called this “ an ethically disconcerting distraction”. What do you think ? I think advanced breast cancer is far more expensive than early cancer caught and cured. 

A new study from the University of Minnesota School of Public Health has shown that less than half of new mothers returning to work have adequate space and time to pump. Meanwhile, in related news, the Army now requires commanders to allow breastfeeding soldiers to have time and space to pump. To clarify, many soldiers stay stateside or in non-hostile countries with family on bases and serve in technical or support positions. 

One article and two more separate recent studies indicate a higher infant mortality for non- hospital births than hospital births. ACOG estimates risk at two to threefold across the board. Remember there is also evidence demonstrating a 14 fold incidence of first Apgar of ZERO in those delivering their first baby at home. All this seems self evident to me given all my eyes have seen. 

The American College of Physicians has come out against routine pelvic exams in the the asymptomatic woman. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has made it clear it supports annual pelvic exams. Recall that pelvic exams need not always include a pap, since a pap is the collection of cells from the cervix to be evaluated in the lab. Pelvic exams confer a wealth of information about infection, pelvic relaxation, masses in the uterus, masses in the ovaries, etc. Ask any ob/gyn; They will tell you they find significant things on pelvic exams in asymptomatic women all the time. It looks like this needs to be formally studied. 

Uh oh, more bad news for Essure, those little coils placed in the tubes for sterilization. (Darn it, this seemed so promising. ) A new study in the British Medical Journal evaluated over 52,000 women sterilized with Essure. These women were 10 times more likely to go to surgery in the following year than those that were sterilized with a traditional tubal sterilization procedure. It is interesting to note that the FDA ( Food and Drug Administration) did NOT require documentation of Essure’s performance though a RCT ( randomized controlled trial). 

A study in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute has shown 61% of women obtaining mammograms will have at least one false positive report. They are advocating that physicians do more to educate and reduce anxiety associated with these results. 

In the good news and empowerment department, a Norwegian Study reports that pregnant women who exercise regularly in the three months prior to pregnancy report less pelvic pain in pregnancy that their non exercising counterparts. And this is making me smile: High impact exercise was the most strongly associated with decreased pain. So, did these women go through life feeling less pain to begin with thus tolerate exercise and pregnancy better, or did the performance of the exercise change something about the way they perceive pain ? A study like this cannot answer these questions, but they are interesting to ask. 

Stay tunes for more news form the world of OB/GYN next week on Medical Monday. 

Weekly News Update in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Good Monday news readers. 

This week, card carrying Ob/Gyns the world over are going all green on us. The World Health Organization and no less than 6 other international Ob/GYN professional societies have “ come out” calling for “ providers to incorporate environmental health screening as a part of routine practice." They have also asked that clinicians become active on a local, national, and global levels to advocate against exposure to toxic chemicals in the environment. 

In sensational news, a Finnish study reports that discontinuation of hormone therapy may increase the risk of cardiovascular death. This news comes as one of many postscripts to the large Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study designed to assess the effects of two forms of hormone therapy (HT): combined therapy with conjugated estrogens plus synthetic progesterone, and unopposed estradiol in those with a hysterectomy. Until the WHI, conventional wisdom was that HT prevented heart disease, but fostered breast cancer. Surprisingly the WHI showed women in the combined HT group had small but significant increased risks of both heart disease and breast cancer. Those in the estradiol alone group had neither. 

In Finland, which has a highly regulated and uniform brand of socialized medicine, the use of HT took a steep dive upon the release of the WHI. ( It did in the US too.) Examination of this time period a few years ago in Finland has yielded these new insights. No one knows precisely why this is the case, but the authors speculated that it is because only estradiol, either with or without progesterone, is used in Finland. No conjugated estrogens are used. 

 It turns out that the average age of the women in the WHI was 63, a good 12 years older than the average age of natural menopause. These were women who might have accumulated atherosclerotic disease before even starting the HT. Authors of a related recent Finnish study speculated that estrogen may be good for clean vessels, but bad for atherosclerotic ones. This is physiologically plausible since estrogen encourages turnover of the vascular lining, which is where plaques happen. The plot on HT thickens again, but maybe in a good way. Stay tuned. 

Cup half full or half empty ?  The CDC reports that there has been a 44 % increase since last year of hospital policy driven encouragement of breastfeeding within one hour of birth. The trend is good ! However, the respected blog “ Shots”  at NPR ( National Public Radio) decried the findings, pointing out that most hospitals still are not doing a good enough job promoting breastfeeding and most hospitals give formula despite mothers wishes.The cup has some water in it….errr milk. 

Aren’t there some animals who ovulate in response to intercourse ? Kitty cats ? Animal lovers help me here. A new study in the Journal Fertility and Sterility has identified intercourse induced changes the immune system that are pregnancy favorable. Researchers have stated “... sex outside the fertile window is still important for triggering important changes in a woman’s body that may promote a healthy pregnancy.' Meow. 

Stay tuned for more news from the world of Ob/Gyn next week in Medical Monday. 

Medical Monday: Weekly news updates in Ob/Gyn

Did you know that not all breast cancer is the same? Breast cancer is of course cells from the breast which have become abnormal and behave in an unregulated destructive manner. We can study specific breast cancer cells to determine their particular nature, for example, whether or they have hormone receptors. When we study breast cancer cells for their particular traits what we are really trying to determine is what therapies would be the most effective against that particular breast cancer cell type.

Some tests we do on breast cancer cells are gene tests. A new gene test called Oncotype DX "accurately identifies a group of women whose cancers are so likely to respond to hormone blocking drugs that adding chemo would do little if any good while exposing them to side effects and other health risks”. This test allows certain patients identified by this gene test to skip chemotherapy, and have results which are basically just as good as the corresponding patients who did have to get chemotherapy.

You may have heard that there is increasing support for homebirth in the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom of course has socialized medicine and a completely different medical care and medicolegal  infrastructure than the United States. For example, British homebirth midwives are highly trained graduate-level professionals who have trained with Obstetricians in hospitals. They use modern equipment, can prescribed medications, and are constrained to doing homebirth in very close proximity to hospitals with emergency capabilities. More importantly, they are very careful at patient selection. Finally, medical malpractice liability is handled through the National Health Service. 

None of this can be said for homebirth professionals in the United States where only a high school degree or GED is required along with an online test, care of home birth clinic patients and an observation of a small number of homebirths by a similarly trained person. These “direct entry” or “lay” midwives in the US are not required to carry liability insurance. 

For many reasons including all of this, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) maintains that the safest place to give birth is the hospital or a birthing center. It is interesting to note that because of medical privacy laws and reporting laws of the state, complications of homebirth are vastly under reported and understudied. Those of us who manage complications from unsuccessful home births are very concerned about these things.

Has anybody noticed that the brouhaha over Planned Parenthood has not prevented the government from continuing to function?

A meta-analysis study out of New Zealand  and published in the British medical Journal has once again raised the question of whether or not calcium supplements are useful for strengthening bones. Their study indicates that while supplemental calcium is indeed associated with increases of bone density up to 2%, they conclude this increase was not enough to meaningfully reduce a person's risk of fracture. It is worth noting that in this study they did not actually measure fracture occurrence in the groups over time.

A second study in the the same journal actually showed a slight reduction in people’s fracture risk with calcium supplementation but researchers concluded the change was not enough to make a statement about the effect. Of course the media reported both of these studies as saying that calcium did not strengthen bones. Oversimplify much ? 

In the conventional wisdom department, new research suggests that women who"begin hormone therapy toward the beginning of menopause may have a lower risk of developing heart disease”. Apparently women who start hormone replacement therapy within five years at menopause stayed free heart disease for a longer time than non-users.".

This is exactly what we thought would take place before we studied the matter in the large very important Women's Health Initiative study, which released in 2002. The Women's Health Initiative study or WHI, demonstrated that those on combined estrogen and progesterone hormone replacement therapy actually had slightly increasing cumulative risk of adverse cardiovascular events after menopause. This was not what researchers expected. Conventional wisdom had always been the hormones like estrogen protected against cardiovascular disease, accounting for the commonly observed phenomenon of that premenopausal women rarely had heart attacks, compared to men or postmenopausal women. Unfortunately the Women's Health Initiative was a bit of a lumper, (as opposed to a splitter) in that it evaluated postmenopausal women of all ages all at once. Moreover, the average age of the test subjects was 63. Thus these women for far more than five years after the average age of menopause which is 51. These women would be likely to have already developed pre-existing cardiovascular disease, in the years after the onset of menopause but before the onset of their research protocol hormone replacement therapy.

Many researchers have speculated that there is something disadvantageous about starting hormone replacement therapy once the patient is long into menopause. Conversely clinicians everywhere have noticed positive effects on health and well-being in those who are able to take hormone replacement from the beginning of menopause and into old age. It will be interesting to see if evidence based quantitative science catches up with or remotely matches the conventional wisdom on the streets.

The Federation Internationale of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) is stepping up its research on the relationship between toxic environmental chemicals like BPA and problems like miscarriage and cancer.

Finally, in the good news department,  the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) “recommends pregnant women without obstetrical or medical complications exercise at least 30 minutes a day most if not all days a week, just like the rest of the population.” 

Stay tuned for more fascinating news from the world of obstetrics and gynecology next week on Medical Monday. 

Food Friday: Fasting and What To Do Instead

Fasting and cleansing make headlines. They are dramatic trendy measures taken by those seeking improved health. But do they work ? Are they safe ? 

Fasting is generally regarded as going off food for at least a day. Cleansing involves the same but with some sort of liquids and juices added back. Sometimes enemas are part of the “cleanses”.

Proponents state that they get past their hunger, and that they eventually feel good, even high. They state their bowel movements show they are getting cleaned out. Their stomachs flatten and they feel light. Who wouldn’t want all this ? 

Unfortunately, it doesn’t last. Our physical and mental vitality depends on a flux of matter and energy through our body. It is true that our body is designed to weather the temporary hardship of relative drought or famine, but under these conditions it cannot thrive. 

So many people participating in cleanses or fasts are doing so to achieve optimal health and high performance. However, to really thrive, we need optimal nutrition and optimal activity as much of the time as possible. Fasting and cleanses are not compatible with this. 

What do fasting and cleanses really do ? In many cases, they are dehydrating. This can be dangerous, especially if subjects are very young, old, or unwell. The body does burn fat and glycogen for energy, but in more prolonged fasts, muscle mass is lost. This types of metabolism actually produces more “ toxins”. It does not detoxify. 

All this provides a substantial stress on the body. Stress hormones are activated. Neurotransmitters  which help us cope with stress are activated as well, accounting for the feeling of elation and capability. 

Weight does indeed get lost, but mostly in the form of water, stool, fat and and muscle. When a normal dietary and fluid intake is resumed, most of the weight is regained. Muscle of course can be rebuilt, but this requires exercise and surplus protein in the diet. 

Colon cleanses can be dangerous. The colon has a normal bacterial flora. The importance of the balance of this flora is becoming better understood these days. Colon cleanses disturb this balance and can lead to problems with digestion, dehydration and serious electrolyte abnormalities. 

I have noticed that purveyors of these unproven and dangerous methods charge high prices. I have also noticed that they advertise to vulnerable populations, including those undergoing cancer therapy. I find this very concerning. 

The answer to all of this is very simple. It is common sense evidence based medicine and health maintenance. It is Friday, and I am thinking about the weekend. So instead of going on about this downer topic, I would like to tell you my alternative version of a quick health boost. 

I call it a “spa weekend". To me, this means I will arrange to do several key things this weekend in a concerted spirit of boosting wellness. They are as follows: 

• Get the ideal amount of sleep all weekend. 
• Do morning yoga. 
• Drink green tea each day. 
• Drink 3 liters of water each day. 
• Do longer afternoon workouts each day. 
• Have 3 ideal meals and 3 ideal snacks each day all weekend, heavy on protein, veggies and fruit. 
• Soak in the tub each day. 

I might even do my own pedicure. 

That is my idea of a plan to boost wellness. I hope you can take a spa weekend sometime soon. 

Wellness Wednesday: Getting Real about Wellness Coaches

"Are health coaches a real thing? What do they actually do? Something like that sounds really expensive.” In our survey two weeks ago you said the most helpful thing for your health improvement would be a health coach. Here is the lowdown on this very real and up-and-coming service.

There are a lot of coaches out there. There are a lot of health and wellness coaches out there too. As you know, I have hung out my shingle as an "evidence based" practitioner. Accordingly, if I were to get a wellness coach, I would want one that practiced evidence based coaching. 

I have done a little homework on our behalf, and found that the American College of Sports Medicine certifies only one coaching program in the country at this time, wellcoachesschool.com. Lucky for me, the medical fitness center (health club) associated with my hospital utilizes wellness coaches certified by this school.

However, I too assumed this would be on the expensive side. Here's what I found out. First of all all, prices are cheaper if you are a member of the health club, which stands to reason. Secondly, they offered different packages. The cheapest package without membership was $200 and consisted of eight sessions over eight weeks. This would provide personal training in a small group. This sort of thing would be an out of pocket expense.

On the other hand, I was pleasantly surprised to find out that the more extensive packages involving weight management and wellness coaching for those with serious or chronic medical conditions might be covered by insurance. These programs range from $250-$750 and take place over several months time. Of course any coverage by insurance would have to be determined beforehand and would have to be based on documentation in the patient's medical record by a patient’s physician, someone like me. 

Although I was encouraged by all of this, I did come away from my fact-finding with the impression that my patients who need this most are simply not going to be able to have access to this, afford it or obtain coverage for it. 

This led me to the idea of being your own coach. This is not my idea or a new idea. A simple Google search revealed several reputable sites which deal with this topic. I will share them with you now.  

How to become your own life coach with 14 simple strategies

10 ways to be your own life coach

How to be your own life coach in four easy steps

And my favorite,

Tips from the pros: how to be your own life coach

I am thinking about getting wellness coach certification from wellcoachesschool.com. So much of what I do in the course of the day with my patients is wellness coaching. While it is true that I deliver babies and perform female pelvic surgery, I spend a lot of time and energy trying to get my patients to be well. I would like to be as good as this as possible.

Organize Your Mind, Organize Your Life: Train Your Brain to Get More Done in Less Time

$12.96

By Margaret Moore, Paul Hammerness

Buy on Amazon

I looked into the course curriculum, and I noticed they had two key textbooks, one you get when you register for the classes, and is rather costly. The other is available on Amazon.com for a modest amount of money ( At this time a used one is $0.43 plus $3.99 for shipping. ) It is called "Organize your Mind, Organize your Life” with the subtitle,”Train your brain to get more done in less time”, by Margaret Moore and Paul Hammerness. I think this is a great place to start for people who want to be their own life coach. I know I am going to crack open this book as soon as possible. 

Beyond that I am still going to be giving continued thought to what, in practical every day terms, could help people meet their basic health goals in nutrition, fitness, and stress management.

Stay tuned for more tips on achieving wellness on next weeks Wellness Wednesday.